Katana VentraIP

Air supremacy

Aerial supremacy (also known as air superiority) is the degree to which a side in a conflict holds control of air power over opposing forces. There are levels of control of the air in aerial warfare. Control of the air is the aerial equivalent of command of the sea.

Air power has increasingly become a powerful element of military campaigns; military planners view having an environment of at least air superiority as a necessity. Air supremacy allows increased bombing efforts, tactical air support for ground forces, paratroop assaults, airdrops and simple cargo plane transfers, which can move ground forces and supplies. Air power is a function of the degree of air superiority and numbers or types of aircraft, but it represents a situation that defies black-and-white characterization. The degree of a force's air control is a zero-sum game with its opponent's; increasing control by one corresponds to decreasing control by the other. Air forces unable to contest for air superiority or air parity can strive for air denial, where they maintain an operations level conceding air superiority to the other side, but preventing it from achieving air supremacy.


The achievement of aerial supremacy does not guarantee a low loss rate of friendly aircraft, as hostile forces are often able to adopt unconventional tactics or identify weaknesses. For example, NATO forces which held aerial superiority over Kosovo still lost a stealth strike aircraft to a Serbian ground-based air defense system, despite it being considered "obsolete".[1] Several engagements have occurred in asymmetrical conflicts in which relatively poorly-equipped ground forces have been able to achieve aircraft kills despite working against overwhelming aerial supremacy. During both the Iraq War and the War in Afghanistan, insurgents found a greater degree of success in attacking coalition aircraft on the ground than when they were operating above them in the skies.

Air supremacy is the highest level, where a side holds complete control of the skies. It is defined by and the United States Department of Defense as the "degree of air superiority wherein the opposing air force is incapable of effective interference".[2][3][4]

NATO

Air superiority is the second level, where a side is in a more favorable position than the opponent. It is defined in the NATO glossary as the "degree of in [an] air battle ... that permits the conduct of operations by [one side] and its related land, sea and air forces at a given time and place without prohibitive interference by opposing air forces."[3]

dominance

Favorable air situation is defined as "an air situation in which the extent of air effort applied by the enemy air forces is insufficient to prejudice the success of friendly land, sea or air operations."

[2]

Air parity is the lowest level of control, where no side holds any level of control of skies.

Air superiority fighter

(documentary TV series)

Battleplan

Canadian Forces aerospace doctrine

Command of the sea

Defense Technical Information Center

No-fly zone

Overmatch

Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses

Technological supremacy

and its film

Victory Through Air Power

Air Power In Peripheral Conflict: The cases of Korea and Vietnam

Defense Technical Information Center

Australian Department of Defence

Col. John A. Warden III. The Air Campaign: Planning for Combat. June 2000.

Encyclopædia Britannica

Archived 22 January 2000 at the Wayback Machine

Glossary of Nato Definitions

The Luftwaffe and the battle for air superiority: Blueprint or warning

RAND Study of U.S. Fighter Design