Katana VentraIP

Air traffic control

Air traffic control (ATC) is a service provided by ground-based air traffic controllers (people) who direct aircraft on the ground and through a given section of controlled airspace, and can provide advisory services to aircraft in non-controlled airspace. The primary purpose of ATC worldwide is to prevent collisions, organise and expedite the flow of traffic in the air, and provide information and other support for pilots.[1]

"Air traffic" redirects here. For the Canadian band, see Air Traffic Control (band). For the Owl City song, see Maybe I'm Dreaming.

Personnel of air traffic control monitor aircraft location in their assigned airspace by radar, and communicate with the pilots by radio.[2] To prevent collisions, ATC enforces traffic separation rules, which ensure each aircraft maintains a minimum amount of 'empty space' around it at all times. It is also common for ATC to provide services to all private, military, and commercial aircraft operating within its airspace; not just civilian aircraft. Depending on the type of flight and the class of airspace, ATC may issue instructions that pilots are required to obey, or advisories (known as flight information in some countries) that pilots may, at their discretion, disregard. The pilot in command of their aircraft always retain final authority for its safe operation, and may, in an emergency, deviate from ATC instructions to the extent required to maintain safe operation of their aircraft.[3]

History[edit]

In 1920, Croydon Airport near London, England, was the first airport in the world to introduce air traffic control.[5] The 'aerodrome control tower' was a wooden hut 15 feet (5 metres) high with windows on all four sides. It was commissioned on 25 February 1920, and provided basic traffic, weather, and location information to pilots.[6][7]


In the United States of America, air traffic control developed three divisions. The first of several air mail radio stations (AMRS) was created in 1922, after World War I, when the U.S. Post Office began using techniques developed by the U.S. Army to direct and track the movements of reconnaissance aircraft. Over time, the AMRS morphed into flight service stations. Today's flight service stations do not issue control instructions, but provide pilots with many other flight related informational services. They do relay control instructions from ATC in areas where flight service is the only facility with radio or phone coverage. The first airport traffic control tower, regulating arrivals, departures, and surface movement of aircraft in the USA at a specific airport, opened in Cleveland in 1930. Approach / departure control facilities were created after adoption of radar in the 1950s to monitor and control the busy airspace around larger airports. The first air route traffic control center (ARTCC), which directs the movement of aircraft between departure and destination, was opened in Newark in 1935, followed in 1936 by Chicago and Cleveland.[8] Currently in the U.S., the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) operates 22 Air Route Traffic Control Centers.


After the 1956 Grand Canyon mid-air collision, killing all 128 on board, the FAA was given the air-traffic responsibility over the United States in 1958, and this was followed by other countries. In 1960, Britain, France, Germany, and the Benelux countries set up Eurocontrol, intending to merge their airspaces. The first and only attempt to pool controllers between countries is the Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre (MUAC), founded in 1972 by Eurocontrol, and covering Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and north-western Germany. In 2001, the European Union (EU) aimed to create a 'Single European Sky', hoping to boost efficiency and gain economies of scale.[9]

In America, delays caused by ATC grew by 69% between 2012 and 2017. ATC staffing issues were a major factor in congestion.[20]

[9]

In China, the average delay per domestic flight spiked by 50% in 2017 to 15 minutes per flight.

In Europe, en route delays grew by 105% in 2018, due to a lack of capacity or staff (60%), weather (25%) or strikes (14%), costing the European economy €17.6bn ($20.8bn), up by 28% on 2017.

Call signs[edit]

A prerequisite to safe air traffic separation is the assignment and use of distinctive call signs. These are permanently allocated by ICAO on request, usually to scheduled flights, and some air forces and other military services for military flights. There are written call signs with a two or three letter combination followed by the flight number such as AAL872 or VLG1011. As such, they appear on flight plans and ATC radar labels. There are also the audio or radio-telephony call signs used on the radio contact between pilots and air traffic control. These are not always identical to their written counterparts. An example of an audio call sign would be 'Speedbird 832', instead of the written 'BAW832'. This is used to reduce the chance of confusion between ATC and the aircraft. By default, the call sign for any other flight is the registration number (or tail number in US parlance) of the aircraft, such as 'N12345', 'C-GABC', or 'EC-IZD'. The short radio-telephony call signs for these tail numbers is the last three letters using the NATO phonetic alphabet (e.g. ABC, spoken alpha-bravo-charlie for C-GABC), or the last three numbers (e.g. three-four-five for N12345). In the United States, the prefix may be an aircraft type, model, or manufacturer in place of the first registration character, for example, 'N11842' could become 'Cessna 842'.[21] This abbreviation is only allowed after communications have been established in each sector.


Before around 1980, International Air Transport Association (IATA) and ICAO were using the same two-letter call signs. Due to the larger number of new airlines after deregulation, the ICAO established the three-letter call signs as mentioned above. The IATA call signs are currently used in aerodromes on the announcement tables, but are no longer used in air traffic control. For example, AA is the IATA call sign for American Airlines; the ATC equivalent is AAL. Flight numbers in regular commercial flights are designated by the aircraft operator, and identical call sign might be used for the same scheduled journey each day it is operated, even if the departure time varies a little across different days of the week. The call sign of the return flight often differs only by the final digit from the outbound flight. Generally, airline flight numbers are even if east-bound, and odd if west-bound. In order to reduce the possibility of two call signs on one frequency at any time sounding too similar, a number of airlines, particularly in Europe, have started using alphanumeric call signs that are not based on flight numbers (e.g. DLH23LG, spoken as Lufthansa-two-three-lima-golf, to prevent confusion between incoming DLH23 and outgoing DLH24 in the same frequency). Additionally, it is the right of the air traffic controller to change the 'audio' call sign for the period the flight is in his sector if there is a risk of confusion, usually choosing the aircraft registration identifier instead.

Flight data processing systems: this is the system (usually one per centre) that processes all the information related to the flight (the flight plan), typically in the time horizon from gate to gate (airport departure / arrival gates). It uses such processed information to invoke other flight plan related tools (such as e.g. ), and distributes such processed information to all the stakeholders (air traffic controllers, collateral centres, airports, etc).

MTCD

(STCA) that checks possible conflicting trajectories in a time horizon of about two or three minutes (or even less in approach context; 35 seconds in the French Roissy & Orly approach centres[23]) and alerts the controller prior to the loss of separation. The algorithms used may also provide in some systems a possible vectoring solution, that is, the manner in which to turn, descend, increase / decrease speed, or climb the aircraft in order to avoid infringing the minimum safety distance or altitude clearance.

Short-term conflict alert

(MSAW): a tool that alerts the controller if an aircraft appears to be flying too low to the ground or will impact terrain based on its current altitude and heading.

Minimum safe altitude warning

System coordination (SYSCO) to enable controller to negotiate the release of flights from one sector to another.

Area penetration warning (APW) to inform a controller that a flight will penetrate a restricted area.

departure manager

Converging runway display aid (CRDA): enables approach controllers to run two final approaches that intersect, and make sure that go arounds are minimised.

Center TRACON automation system (CTAS): a suite of human centred decision support tools developed by NASA Ames Research Center. Several of the CTAS tools have been field tested and transitioned to the FAA for operational evaluation and use. Some of the CTAS tools are: traffic management advisor (TMA), passive final approach spacing tool (pFAST), collaborative arrival planning (CAP), direct-to (D2), en route descent advisor (EDA), and multi-center TMA. The software is running on Linux.

[24]

Traffic management advisor (TMA): a CTAS tool, is an en-route decision support tool that automates time based metering solutions to provide an upper limit of aircraft to a TRACON from the centre over a set period of time. Schedules are determined that will not exceed the specified arrival rate, and controllers use the scheduled times to provide the appropriate delay to arrivals, while in the en-route domain. This results in an overall reduction in en-route delays, and also moves the delays to more efficient airspace (higher altitudes) than occur if holding near the TRACON boundary, which is required in order to prevent overloading the TRACON controllers. TMA is operational at most en-route air route traffic control centres (ARTCCs), and continues to be enhanced to address more complex traffic situations (e.g. adjacent centre metering (ACM) and en route departure capability (EDC))

MTCD

Many technologies are used in air traffic control systems. Primary and secondary radar are used to enhance a controller's situation awareness within their assigned airspace; all types of aircraft send back primary echoes of varying sizes to controllers' screens as radar energy is bounced off their skins, and transponder-equipped aircraft reply to secondary radar interrogations by giving an ID (Mode A), an altitude (Mode C), and / or a unique callsign (Mode S). Certain types of weather may also register on the radar screen. These inputs, added to data from other radars, are correlated to build the air situation. Some basic processing occurs on the radar tracks, such as calculating ground speed and magnetic headings.


Usually, a flight data processing system manages all the flight plan related data, incorporating, in a low or high degree, the information of the track once the correlation between them (flight plan and track) is established. All this information is distributed to modern operational display systems, making it available to controllers.


The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has spent over US$3 billion on software, but a fully automated system is still yet to be achieved. In 2002, the United Kingdom commissioned a new area control centre into service at the London Area Control Centre (LACC) at Swanwick in Hampshire, relieving a busy suburban centre at West Drayton in Middlesex, north of London Heathrow Airport. Software from Lockheed-Martin predominates at the London Area Control Centre. However, the centre was initially troubled by software and communications problems causing delays and occasional shutdowns.[22]


Some tools are available in different domains to help the controller further:

Azerbaijan – AzərAeroNaviqasiya

Albania –

Albcontrol

Algeria – Etablissement National de la Navigation Aérienne (ENNA)

Argentina – (EANA)

Empresa Argentina de Navegación Aérea

Armenia – Armenian Air Traffic Services (ARMATS)

Australia – (government owned corporation) and Royal Australian Air Force

Airservices Australia

Austria –

Austro Control

Bangladesh –

Civil Aviation Authority, Bangladesh

Belarus – Republican Unitary Enterprise Белаэронавигация (Belarusian Air Navigation)

Belgium – - Authority of Airways

Skeyes

Bosnia and Herzegovina – Agencija za pružanje usluga u zračnoj plovidbi (Bosnia and Herzegovina Air Navigation Services Agency)

Brazil – (ATC/ATM Authority) and ANAC – Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil (Civil Aviation Authority)

Departamento de Controle do Espaço Aéreo

Bulgaria – Air Traffic Services Authority

Cambodia – Cambodia Air Traffic Services (CATS)

Canada – , formerly provided by Transport Canada and Canadian Forces

Nav Canada

Cayman Islands –

CIAA Cayman Islands Airports Authority

Chile – Dirección General de Aeronáutica Civil (DGAC)

Colombia – Aeronáutica Civil Colombiana (UAEAC)

Croatia – Hrvatska kontrola zračne plovidbe (Croatia Control Ltd.)

Cuba – Instituto de Aeronáutica Civil de Cuba (IACC)

Czech Republic – Řízení letového provozu ČR

Cyprus – Department of Civil Aviation

Denmark – (Danish ATC)

Naviair

Dominican Republic – Instituto Dominicano de Aviación Civil (IDAC) 'Dominican Institute of Civil Aviation'

Ecuador – Dirección General de Aviación Civil (DGAC) 'General Direction of Civil Aviation' government body

Estonia – Estonian Air Navigation Services

Europe – (European organisation for the safety of air navigation)

Eurocontrol

Fiji – Fiji Airports (fully owned government commercial company)

Finland –

Finavia

France – Direction Générale de l'Aviation Civile (): Direction des Services de la Navigation Aérienne (DSNA) (government body)

DGAC

Georgia – SAKAERONAVIGATSIA, Ltd. (Georgian Air Navigation)

Germany – (German ATC – state-owned company)

Deutsche Flugsicherung

Greece – (HCAA)

Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority

Hong Kong – (CAD)

Civil Aviation Department

Hungary – HungaroControl Magyar Légiforgalmi Szolgálat Zrt. (HungaroControl Hungarian Air Navigation Services Pte. Ltd. Co.)

Iceland –

ISAVIA

India – (AAI) (under Ministry of Civil Aviation, Government of India and Indian Air Force)

Airports Authority of India

Indonesia – AirNav Indonesia

Iran – Iran Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)

Ireland – (IAA)

Irish Aviation Authority

Iraq – Iraqi Air Navigation – ICAA

Israel – (IIA)

Israeli Airports Authority

Italy – SpA and Italian Air Force

ENAV

Jamaica – Jamaica Civil Aviation Authority (JCAA)

Japan – (JCAB)

Japan Civil Aviation Bureau

Kenya – Kenya Civil Aviation Authority (KCAA)

Latvia – LGS (Latvian ATC)

Lithuania – ANS (Lithuanian ATC)

Luxembourg – Administration de la navigation aérienne (ANA – government administration)

Macedonia – DGCA (Macedonian ATC)

Malaysia – Civil Aviation Authority of Malaysia (CAAM)

Malta – Malta Air Traffic Services Ltd

Mexico – Servicios a la Navegación en el Espacio Aéreo Mexicano

Morocco – Office National Des Aeroports (ONDA)

Nepal – Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal

Netherlands – Luchtverkeersleiding Nederland (LVNL) (Dutch ATC) Eurocontrol (Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre)

New Zealand – (state owned enterprise)

Airways New Zealand

Nigeria – Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA)

Norway – (state-owned private company)

Avinor

Oman – Directorate General of Meteorology & Air Navigation (Government of Oman)

Pakistan – (under Government of Pakistan)

Civil Aviation Authority

Peru – Centro de Instrucción de Aviación Civil (CIAC)

Philippines – (CAAP) (under the Philippine Government)

Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines

Poland – (PANSA)

Polish Air Navigation Services Agency

Portugal – NAV (Portuguese ATC)

Puerto Rico –

Administracion Federal de Aviacion

Romania – Romanian Air Traffic Services Administration (ROMATSA)

Russia – Federal State Unitary Enterprise (State ATM Corporation)

Saudi Arabia – Saudi Air Navigation Services (SANS)

Seychelles – Seychelles Civil Aviation Authority (SCAA)

Singapore – (CAAS)

Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore

Serbia – Ltd. (SMATSA)

Serbia and Montenegro Air Traffic Services Agency

Slovakia – Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky

Slovenia – Slovenia Control

South Africa – Air Traffic and Navigation Services (ATNS)

South Korea – Korea Office of Civil Aviation

Spain – now AENA S.A. (Spanish Airports) and ENAIRE (ATC & ATSP)[29]

AENA

Sri Lanka – Airport & Aviation Services (Sri Lanka) Limited (government owned company)

Sweden – (government body)

LFV

Switzerland –

Skyguide

Taiwan – ANWS ()

Civil Aeronautical Administration

Thailand – AEROTHAI (Aeronautical Radio of Thailand)

Trinidad and Tobago – (TTCAA)

Trinidad and Tobago Civil Aviation Authority

Turkey – (DHMI)

General Directorate of State Airports Authority

United Arab Emirates – General Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA)

United Kingdom – (NATS) (49% state-owned public-private partnership, civilian and military)

National Air Traffic Services

United States – (FAA) (government body)

Federal Aviation Administration

Ukraine – Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise (UkSATSE)

Venezuela – Instituto Nacional de Aeronautica Civil (INAC)

Vietnam – Vietnam Air Traffic Management Corporation (VATM)

[30]

Zambia – Zambia Civil Aviation Authority (ZCAA)

[31]

Zimbabwe – Zimbabwe Civil Aviation Authority

[32]

The examines how to overhaul the United States national airspace system.

Next Generation Air Transportation System

is a developing air traffic control method that uses no centralised control (e.g. air traffic controllers). Instead, parts of airspace are reserved dynamically and automatically in a distributed way using computer communication to ensure the required separation between aircraft.[33]

Free flight

ATC regulations in the United States[edit]

The United States airspace is divided into 21 zones (centres), and each zone is divided into sectors. Also within each zone are portions of airspace, about 50 miles (80 kilometres) in diameter, called TRACON (Terminal Radar Approach Control) airspaces. Within each TRACON airspace are a number of airports, each of which has its own airspace with a 5 miles (8.0 kilometres) radius. FAA control tower operators (CTO) / air traffic controllers use FAA Order 7110.65 as the authority for all procedures regarding air traffic.[38]

U.S. Centennial of Flight Commission – Air Traffic Control

The short film is available for free viewing and download at the Internet Archive.

A TRAVELER MEETS AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL (1963)

NASA video of US air traffic