Katana VentraIP

Bauhaus

The Staatliches Bauhaus (German: [ˈʃtaːtlɪçəs ˈbaʊˌhaʊs] ), commonly known as the Bauhaus (German for 'building house'), was a German art school operational from 1919 to 1933 that combined crafts and the fine arts.[1] The school became famous for its approach to design, which attempted to unify individual artistic vision with the principles of mass production and emphasis on function.[1] Along with the doctrine of functionalism, the Bauhaus initiated the conceptual understanding of architecture and design.[2]

For other uses, see Bauhaus (disambiguation).

UNESCO World Heritage Site

Germany

Cultural: ii, iv, vi

729

1996 (20th Session)

8.1614 ha (20.167 acres)

59.26 ha (146.4 acres)

The Bauhaus was founded by architect Walter Gropius in Weimar. It was grounded in the idea of creating a Gesamtkunstwerk ("comprehensive artwork") in which all the arts would eventually be brought together. The Bauhaus style later became one of the most influential currents in modern design, modernist architecture, and architectural education.[3] The Bauhaus movement had a profound influence on subsequent developments in art, architecture, graphic design, interior design, industrial design, and typography.[4] Staff at the Bauhaus included prominent artists such as Paul Klee, Wassily Kandinsky, Gunta Stölzl, and László Moholy-Nagy at various points.


The school existed in three German cities—Weimar, from 1919 to 1925; Dessau, from 1925 to 1932; and Berlin, from 1932 to 1933—under three different architect-directors: Walter Gropius from 1919 to 1928; Hannes Meyer from 1928 to 1930; and Ludwig Mies van der Rohe from 1930 until 1933, when the school was closed by its own leadership under pressure from the Nazi regime, having been painted as a centre of communist intellectualism.[5] Internationally, former key figures of Bauhaus were successful in the United States and became known as the avant-garde for the International Style.[6]


The changes of venue and leadership resulted in a constant shifting of focus, technique, instructors, and politics. For example, the pottery shop was discontinued when the school moved from Weimar to Dessau, even though it had been an important revenue source; when Mies van der Rohe took over the school in 1930, he transformed it into a private school and would not allow any supporters of Hannes Meyer to attend it.

Terms and Concepts[edit]

Several specific features are identified in the Bauhaus forms and shapes: simple geometric shapes like rectangles and spheres, without elaborate decorations. Buildings, furniture, and fonts often feature rounded corners, sometimes rounded walls, or curved chrome pipes. Some buildings are characterized by rectangular features, for example protruding balconies with flat, chunky railings facing the street, and long banks of windows. Some outlines can be defined as a tool for creating an ideal form, which is the basis of the architectural concept.[2]

Architectural output[edit]

The paradox of the early Bauhaus was that, although its manifesto proclaimed that the aim of all creative activity was building,[30] the school did not offer classes in architecture until 1927. During the years under Gropius (1919–1927), he and his partner Adolf Meyer observed no real distinction between the output of his architectural office and the school. The built output of Bauhaus architecture in these years is the output of Gropius: the Sommerfeld house in Berlin, the Otte house in Berlin, the Auerbach house in Jena, and the competition design for the Chicago Tribune Tower, which brought the school much attention. The definitive 1926 Bauhaus building in Dessau is also attributed to Gropius. Apart from contributions to the 1923 Haus am Horn, student architectural work amounted to un-built projects, interior finishes, and craft work like cabinets, chairs and pottery.


In the next two years under Meyer, the architectural focus shifted away from aesthetics and towards functionality. There were major commissions: one from the city of Dessau for five tightly designed "Laubenganghäuser" (apartment buildings with balcony access), which are still in use today, and another for the Bundesschule des Allgemeinen Deutschen Gewerkschaftsbundes (ADGB Trade Union School) in Bernau bei Berlin. Meyer's approach was to research users' needs and scientifically develop the design solution. He intended to place emphasis on Gropius' objective analysis of the properties determining an object's use value, known as Wesensforschung. Gropius believed that it was possible to design exemplary products of universal validity that should be standardized.[31]


Mies van der Rohe repudiated Meyer's politics, his supporters, and his architectural approach. As opposed to Gropius's "study of essentials", and Meyer's research into user requirements, Mies advocated a "spatial implementation of intellectual decisions", which effectively meant an adoption of his own aesthetics. Neither Mies van der Rohe nor his Bauhaus students saw any projects built during the 1930s.


The Bauhaus movement was not focused on developing worker housing. Only two projects, the apartment building project in Dessau and the Törten row housing fall into the worker housing category. It was the Bauhaus contemporaries Bruno Taut, Hans Poelzig and particularly Ernst May, as the city architects of Berlin, Dresden and Frankfurt respectively, who are rightfully credited with the thousands of socially progressive housing units built in Weimar Germany. The housing Taut built in south-west Berlin during the 1920s, close to the U-Bahn stop Onkel Toms Hütte, is still occupied.

A stage in the Festsaal, Dessau

A stage in the Festsaal, Dessau

Ceiling with light fixtures for stage in the Festsaal, Dessau

Ceiling with light fixtures for stage in the Festsaal, Dessau

Dormitory balconies in the residence, Dessau

Dormitory balconies in the residence, Dessau

Mechanically opened windows, Dessau

Mechanically opened windows, Dessau

The Mensa (cafeteria), Dessau

The Mensa (cafeteria), Dessau

Gropius' Expressionist Monument to the March Dead (1921–1922)

A Bauhaus style building in Chemnitz

A Bauhaus style building in Chemnitz

The Molitor Grapholux lamp, by Christian Dell (1922–1925)

The Molitor Grapholux lamp, by Christian Dell (1922–1925)

Heinrich Neuy's children's chair

Heinrich Neuy's children's chair

Clock designed by Erich Dieckmann (1931)

Clock designed by Erich Dieckmann (1931)

The closure, and the response of Mies van der Rohe, is fully documented in Elaine Hochman's Architects of Fortune.

a

Google honored Bauhaus for its 100th anniversary on 12 April 2019 with a .[56]

Google Doodle

Oskar Schlemmer (1972). Tut Schlemmer (ed.). . Translated by Krishna Winston. Wesleyan University Press. ISBN 0-8195-4047-1.

The Letters and Diaries of Oskar Schlemmer

Stefan Boness (2012). Tel Aviv – The White City. Berlin: Jovis.  978-3-939633-75-4.

ISBN

Magdalena Droste, Peter Gossel, ed. (2005). Bauhaus. Taschen America LLC.  3-8228-3649-4.

ISBN

Marty Bax (1991). Bauhaus Lecture Notes 1930–1933. Theory and practice of architectural training at the Bauhaus, based on the lecture notes made by the Dutch ex-Bauhaus student and architect J.J. van der Linden of the Mies van der Rohe curriculum. Amsterdam: Architectura & Natura.  90-71570-04-5.

ISBN

Anja Baumhoff (2001). The Gendered World of the Bauhaus. The Politics of Power at the Weimar Republic's Premier Art Institute, 1919–1931. Frankfurt, New York: Peter Lang.  3-631-37945-5.

ISBN

Boris Friedewald (2009). Bauhaus. Munich, London, New York: Prestel.  978-3-7913-4200-9.

ISBN

Catherine Weill-Rochant (2008). Rita H. Gans (ed.). Bauhaus: Architektur in Tel Aviv (in French and German). Zurich: Kiriat Yearim.

Catherine Weill-Rochant (April 2009). The Tel-Aviv School : a constrained rationalism. DOCOMOMO journal (Documentation and conservation of buildings, sites and neighbourhoods of the modern movement).

Peder Anker (2010). . LSU Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-3551-8.

From Bauhaus to Ecohouse: A History of Ecological Design

Kirsten Baumann (2007). Bauhaus Dessau: Architecture Design Concept. Berlin: JOVIS Verlag.  978-3-939633-11-2.

ISBN

Monika Markgraf, ed. (2007). Archaeology of Modernism: Renovation Bauhaus Dessau. Berlin: JOVIS Verlag.  978-3-936314-83-0.

ISBN

Torsten Blume / Burghard Duhm (Eds.) (2008). Bauhaus.Theatre.Dessau: Change of Scene. Berlin: JOVIS Verlag.  978-3-936314-81-6.

ISBN

Eric Cimino (2003). (M.A.). Boston: UMass-Boston.

Student Life at the Bauhaus, 1919–1933

Olaf Thormann: Bauhaus Saxony. arnoldsche Art Publishers 2019,  978-3-89790-553-5.

ISBN

Edwards, M. Jean (September 2019). . Journal of Interior Design. 44 (3): 135–140. doi:10.1111/joid.12158. ISSN 1071-7641. S2CID 201241249.

"Lessons of the Bauhaus"

Google Arts & Culture

Bauhaus Everywhere

at Curlie

Bauhaus

. Bauhaus Kooperation. Archived from the original on 20 June 2020. Retrieved 28 March 2019.

"Germany celebrates the Bauhaus Centenary"

. Bauhaus Kooperation. Archived from the original on 27 October 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2019.

"100 years of Bauhaus"

. Tate art. Retrieved 12 April 2019.

"Glossary definition for Bauhaus}"

Gropius, Walter. . Design Museum of Chicago. Retrieved 12 April 2019.

"Manifesto of the Staatliches Bauhaus"

. The Fostinum. Retrieved 12 April 2019.

"Fostinum: Photographs and art from the Bauhaus"

. J. Paul Getty Trust. hdl:10020/cifa850514. Retrieved 12 April 2019.

"Finding Aid for archive of Bauhaus student work, 1919–1933"

. J. Paul Getty Trust. hdl:10020/cifa850513. Retrieved 12 April 2019.

"Finding Aid for archive of Bauhaus typography collection, 1919–1937"

from the University of Michigan Museum of Art

Collection: Artists of the Bauhaus