Katana VentraIP

Boiling water reactor

A boiling water reactor (BWR) is a type of light water nuclear reactor used for the generation of electrical power. It is the second most common type of electricity-generating nuclear reactor after the pressurized water reactor (PWR), which is also a type of light water nuclear reactor.

The main difference between a BWR and PWR is that in a BWR, the reactor core heats water, which turns to steam and then drives a steam turbine. In a PWR, the reactor core heats water, which does not boil. This hot water then exchanges heat with a lower pressure system, which turns water into steam that drives the turbine.


The BWR was developed by the Argonne National Laboratory and General Electric (GE) in the mid-1950s. The main present manufacturer is GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy, which specializes in the design and construction of this type of reactor.

Evolution[edit]

Early concepts[edit]

The BWR concept was developed slightly later than the PWR concept. Development of the BWR started in the early 1950s, and was a collaboration between General Electric (GE) and several US national laboratories.


Research into nuclear power in the US was led by the three military services. The Navy, seeing the possibility of turning submarines into full-time underwater vehicles, and ships that could steam around the world without refueling, sent their man in engineering, Captain Hyman Rickover to run their nuclear power program. Rickover decided on the PWR route for the Navy, as the early researchers in the field of nuclear power feared that the direct production of steam within a reactor would cause instability, while they knew that the use of pressurized water would definitively work as a means of heat transfer. This concern led to the US's first research effort in nuclear power being devoted to the PWR, which was highly suited for naval vessels (submarines, especially), as space was at a premium, and PWRs could be made compact and high-power enough to fit into such vessels.


But other researchers wanted to investigate whether the supposed instability caused by boiling water in a reactor core would really cause instability. During early reactor development, a small group of engineers accidentally increased the reactor power level on an experimental reactor to such an extent that the water quickly boiled. This shut down the reactor, indicating the useful self-moderating property in emergency circumstances. In particular, Samuel Untermyer II, a researcher at Argonne National Laboratory, proposed and oversaw a series of experiments: the BORAX experiments—to see if a boiling water reactor would be feasible for use in energy production. He found that it was, after subjecting his reactors to quite strenuous tests, proving the safety principles of the BWR.[6]


Following this series of tests, GE got involved and collaborated with Argonne National Laboratory[7] to bring this technology to market. Larger-scale tests were conducted through the late 1950s/early/mid-1960s that only partially used directly generated (primary) nuclear boiler system steam to feed the turbine and incorporated heat exchangers for the generation of secondary steam to drive separate parts of the turbines. The literature does not indicate why this was the case, but it was eliminated on production models of the BWR.

The reactor vessel and associated components operate at a substantially lower pressure of about 70–75 bars (1,020–1,090 psi) compared to about 155 bars (2,250 psi) in a PWR.

Pressure vessel is subject to significantly less irradiation compared to a PWR, and so does not become as brittle with age.

Operates at a lower nuclear fuel temperature, largely due to heat transfer by the latent , as opposed to sensible heat in PWRs.

heat of vaporization

Fewer large metal and overall components due to a lack of steam generators and a pressurizer vessel, as well as the associated primary circuit pumps. (Older BWRs have external recirculation loops, but even this piping is eliminated in modern BWRs, such as the .) This also makes BWRs simpler to operate.

ABWR

Lower risk (probability) of a rupture causing loss of coolant compared to a PWR, and lower risk of core damage should such a rupture occur. This is due to fewer pipes, fewer large-diameter pipes, fewer welds and no steam generator tubes.

NRC assessments of limiting fault potentials indicate if such a fault occurred, the average BWR would be less likely to sustain core damage than the average PWR due to the robustness and redundancy of the .

Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS)

Measuring the water level in the pressure vessel is the same for both normal and emergency operations, which results in easy and intuitive assessment of emergency conditions.

Can operate at lower core power density levels using natural circulation without forced flow.

A BWR may be designed to operate using only natural circulation so that recirculation pumps are eliminated. (The new ESBWR design uses natural circulation.)

BWRs do not use to control fission burn-up to avoid the production of tritium (contamination of the turbines),[2] leading to less possibility of corrosion within the reactor vessel and piping. (Corrosion from boric acid must be carefully monitored in PWRs; it has been demonstrated that reactor vessel head corrosion can occur if the reactor vessel head is not properly maintained. See Davis-Besse. Since BWRs do not utilize boric acid, these contingencies are eliminated.)

boric acid

[2]

BWRs generally have N-2 redundancy on their major safety-related systems, which normally consist of four "trains" of components. This generally means that up to two of the four components of a safety system can fail and the system will still perform if called upon.

APWR

Sweden

Maximum Fraction Limiting Critical Power Ratio, or MFLCPR;

Fraction Limiting Linear Heat Generation Rate, or FLLHGR;

Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate, or APLHGR;

Pre-Conditioning Interim Operating Management Recommendation, or PCIOMR;

BORAX experiments

(Experimental Boiling Water Reactor)

EBWR

(destroyed during accident in 1961)

SL-1

Boiling water reactor safety systems

BORAX experiments

Climate change mitigation

Containment building

3 BWRs damaged after 2011 tsunami

Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

List of nuclear reactors

Nuclear Power 2010 Program

Pressurized water reactor

Samuel Untermyer II

Boiling Water Reactors, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Shows Mark I/II/III containment and shows BWR6 components.

BWR systems overview.

(table of contents, with active links to text).

Advanced BWR General Description

. Archived from the original on 2008-06-16. Retrieved 2004-12-26.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)

"Technical details and features of Advanced BWRs"

Choppin, Gregory R.; ; Rydberg, Jan (2002). "Chapter 20: Nuclear Power Reactors" (PDF). Radiochemistry and Nuclear Chemistry. Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-7506-7463-8. Describes various reactor types.

Liljenzin, Jan-Olov

GE BWR/4 technical specifications: , Rational for safety rules.

Safety rules

GE BWR/6 technical specifications: , Rational for safety rules.

Safety rules

The Nuclear Tourist website