Katana VentraIP

Determinism

Determinism is the philosophical view that all events in the universe, including human decisions and actions, are causally inevitable.[1] Deterministic theories throughout the history of philosophy have developed from diverse and sometimes overlapping motives and considerations. Like eternalism, determinism focuses on particular events rather than the future as a concept. The opposite of determinism is indeterminism, or the view that events are not deterministically caused but rather occur due to chance. Determinism is often contrasted with free will, although some philosophers claim that the two are compatible.[2][3]

This article is about the general notion of determinism in philosophy. For other uses, see Determinism (disambiguation).

Historically, debates about determinism have involved many philosophical positions and given rise to multiple varieties or interpretations of determinism. One topic of debate concerns the scope of determined systems. Some philosophers have maintained that the entire universe is a single determinate system, while others identify more limited determinate systems. Another common debate topic is whether determinism and free will can coexist; compatibilism and incompatibilism represent the opposing sides of this debate.


Determinism should not be confused with the self-determination of human actions by reasons, motives, and desires. Determinism is about interactions which affect cognitive processes in people's lives.[4] It is about the cause and the result of what people have done. Cause and result are always bound together in cognitive processes. It assumes that if an observer has sufficient information about an object or human being, that such an observer might be able to predict every consequent move of that object or human being. Determinism rarely requires that perfect prediction be practically possible.

sometimes called genetic determinism, is the idea that each of human behaviors, beliefs, and desires are fixed by human genetic nature.

Biological determinism

involves the idea that all behavior can be traced to specific causes—either environmental or reflexive. John B. Watson and B. F. Skinner developed this nurture-focused determinism.

Behaviorism

contends that the physical world impacts and sets constraints on human behavior.

Cultural materialism

along with social determinism, is the nurture-focused theory that the culture in which we are raised determines who we are.

Cultural determinism

also known as climatic or geographical determinism, proposes that the physical environment, rather than social conditions, determines culture. Supporters of environmental determinism often also support behavioral determinism. Key proponents of this notion have included Ellen Churchill Semple, Ellsworth Huntington, Thomas Griffith Taylor and possibly Jared Diamond, although his status as an environmental determinist is debated.[34]

Environmental determinism

Immaterial souls are all that exist ().

idealism

Immaterial souls exist and exert a non-deterministic causal influence on bodies (traditional free-will, ).[42][43]

interactionist dualism

Immaterial souls exist but are part of a deterministic framework.

Immaterial souls exist, but exert no causal influence, free or determined (, occasionalism)

epiphenomenalism

Immaterial souls do not exist – there is no mind–body , and there is a materialistic explanation for intuitions to the contrary.

dichotomy

(2003) Freedom Evolves. Viking Penguin.

Daniel Dennett

(2007) "Aspects of Determinism in Modern Physics" in Butterfield, J., and Earman, J., eds., Philosophy of Physics, Part B. North Holland: 1369–1434.

John Earman

(2005) "Physics and the Real World", Physics Today.

George Ellis

Epstein, J.M. (1999). "Agent Based Models and Generative Social Science". Complexity. IV (5): 41–60. :1999Cmplx...4e..41E. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.118.546. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0526(199905/06)4:5<41::aid-cplx9>3.0.co;2-f.

Bibcode

Epstein, J.M. and Axtell R. (1996) Growing Artificial Societies – Social Science from the Bottom. MIT Press.

Harris, James A. (2005) Of Liberty and Necessity: The Free Will Debate in Eighteenth-Century British Philosophy. Clarendon Press.

Kenrick, D. T.; Li, N. P.; Butner, J. (2003). (PDF). Psychological Review. 110 (1): 3–28. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.526.5218. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.3. PMID 12529056. S2CID 43306158.

"Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Individual decision rules and emergent social norms"

Quantum Mechanics, English translation by G. M. Temmer of Mécanique Quantique, 1966, John Wiley and Sons, vol. I, chapter IV, section III.

Albert Messiah

Ernest Nagel (3 March 1960). "Determinism in history". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 20 (3): 291–317. :10.2307/2105051. JSTOR 2105051. (Online version found here)

doi

John T Roberts (2006). . In Sahotra Sarkar; Jessica Pfeifer (eds.). The Philosophy of Science: A–M. Taylor & Francis. pp. 197 ff. ISBN 978-0415977098.

"Determinism"

Nowak A., Vallacher R.R., Tesser A., Borkowski W., (2000) "Society of Self: The emergence of collective properties in self-structure", Psychological Review 107.

"Is the Cosmos Random? (Einstein's assertion that God does not play dice with the universe has been misinterpreted)", Scientific American, vol. 313, no. 3 (September 2015), pp. 88–93.

George Musser

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Causal Determinism

from the Dictionary of the History of Ideas

Determinism in History

Philosopher Ted Honderich's Determinism web resource

Determinism on Information Philosopher

Archived 26 January 2021 at the Wayback Machine

The Society of Natural Science

Determinism and Free Will in Judaism

Snooker, Pool, and Determinism