Katana VentraIP

Distinct society

Distinct society (in French: la société distincte) is a political term especially used during constitutional debate in Canada, in the second half of the 1980s and in the early 1990s, and present in the two failed constitutional amendments, the Meech Lake Accord and the Charlottetown Accord. "Distinct society" refers to the uniqueness of the province of Quebec within Canada, although here the meaning of "unique" is vague and controversial.

Origin[edit]

Quebec is not explicitly declared distinct in the Constitution of Canada. However, constitutional scholar Peter Hogg argues that several parts of the Constitution already indicate Quebec has distinctiveness that should be reflected in law. Canadian federalism itself, bilingualism in the federal and Quebec legislatures, educational rights, and the acknowledgment of the importance of Roman Catholicism in Quebec were cited as examples.[1]


Experts disagree on whether Quebec is a "distinct society" or "unique culture", and whether and how to enshrine such status in the Constitution.[2] The term "distinct society" was invented as a description for Quebec by Jean Lesage,[3] the Provincial Premier from 1960 to 1966. In addition to using this terminology, Lesage also advocated that Quebec's special status be recognized in the Constitution, which presaged the constitutional amendments later proposed in the Meech Lake and Charlottetown Accords. Lesage did not achieve his desired constitutional amendment as premier.[4]


Quebec was also referred to as a distinct society by the Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism.[3]

The 1995 referendum and beyond[edit]

In the run-up to the 1995 Quebec referendum, Prime Minister Jean Chrétien opposed recognition of Quebec's distinct society until he reversed himself shortly before the independence vote. However, Ontario Premier Mike Harris refused to support a constitutional amendment on the matter. A House of Commons resolution did endorse recognition of Quebec's distinct society.[5][8] That recognition asked institutions of government "to take note of this recognition and be guided in their conduct accordingly."[9] Since the death of the Meech and Charlottetown accords, the use of the expression has faded, replaced within Quebec with the term nation to describe Quebec, its people, and its state. On November 27, 2006, the federal House of Commons also voted to recognize the Québécois as a nation within Canada.[10][11][12] As only a motion of the House, it is not legally binding.


Other euphemisms used mainly by federalist nationalists and federalists outside Quebec are different or unique society. The Calgary Declaration of 1997, for example, describes Quebec as "unique".

Autonomy

History of Quebec

Politics of Quebec

Quebec federalism

Quebec sovereigntism

Burgess, Michael. "Ethnicity, nationalism and identity in Canada‐Quebec relations: The case of Quebec's ‘distinct society’." Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 34.2 (1996): 46-64.

Canada. Library of Parliament. Research Branch. "Distinct society: Origins, interpretations, implications." (Library of Parliament, Research Branch, 1995).

Denis, Claude. "Quebec-as-distinct-society as conventional wisdom: The constitutional silence of anglo-Canadian sociologists." Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie (1993): 251–269.

Harrison, Trevor W., and John W. Friesen. Canadian Society in the Twenty-First Century, 3e: An Historical Sociological Approach (3rd ed. Canadian Scholars’ Press, 2015).

Johnston, Richard, and Andre Blais. "Meech Lake and Mass Politics: The'Distinct Society'Clause." Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques (1988): S25-S42.

online