Katana VentraIP

Government procurement in the United States

In the United States, the processes of government procurement enable federal, state and local government bodies in the country to acquire goods, services (including construction), and interests in real property.[1] Contracting with the federal government or with state and local public bodies enables interested businesses to become suppliers in these markets.

In fiscal year 2019, the US Federal Government spent $597bn on contracts.[2] The market for state, local, and education (SLED) contracts is thought to be worth $1.5 trillion. Supplies are purchased from both domestic and overseas suppliers. Contracts for federal government procurement usually involve appropriated funds spent on supplies, services, and interests in real property by and for the use of the Federal Government through purchase or lease, whether the supplies, services, or interests are already in existence or must be created, developed, demonstrated, and evaluated.[3] Federal Government contracting has the same legal elements as contracting between private parties: a lawful purpose, competent contracting parties, an offer, an acceptance that complies with the terms of the offer, mutuality of obligation, and consideration. However, federal procurement is much more heavily regulated, subject to volumes of statutes dealing with federal contracts and the federal contracting process, mostly in Titles 10 (Armed Forces), 31 (Money and Finance), 40 (Protection of the Environment), and 41 (Public Contracts) within the United States Code.

($365.9 bn)

Department of Defense

($25.7 bn)

Department of Energy

($19.0 bn)

Health and Human Services

($17.6 bn)

General Services Administration

($16.0 bn).

NASA

In fiscal year 2019, the US Federal Government spent $597bn on contracts.[2] The Obama administration measured spend at over $500bn in 2008, double the spend level of 2001.[4] Other estimates suggest spend was $442bn in fiscal year 2015 [2] and $461bn in 2016.[5] Federal Procurement Reports provide contract data which may be used for geographical, market, and socio-economic analysis, as well as for measuring and assessing the impact of acquisition policy and management improvements.[6]


In fiscal year 2010, the top five departments by dollars obligated were:[7]


The Top 100 Contractors Report for Fiscal Year 2022[8] published by the General Services Administration lists contracts with a combined total of $398.8 billion. The top five are aerospace, defense and medical contractors:


In the same period, small business contracts totalled $153.9 billion.[9]

of 1994 (FASA) Pub. L. No. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3243

Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act

10 U.S.C. § 2323 has language similar to FASA for the Department of Defense (DoD), and the Coast Guard. In this legislation, Congress extended the affirmative action authority granted DoD by 10 U.S.C. § 2323 to all agencies of the Federal Government. See 15 U.S.C. § 644 note. Regulations to implement that authority were delayed because of the decision in Adarand Constructors v. Peña, 515 U.S. 200 (1995). See 60 Fed. Reg. 48,258 (September 18, 1995). See 61 Fed. Reg. 26,042 (May 23, 1996) (proposed reforms to affirmative action in Federal procurement) form the basis for the regulations to implement this provision of FASA. See 62 Fed. Reg. 25,648 (May 9, 1997) for Government response to comments on the proposal, and 62 Fed. Reg. 25,786 (May 9, 1997) (proposed rules), 63 Fed. Reg. 35,719 (June 30, 1998) (interim rules), and 63 Fed. Reg. 36,120 (July 1, 1998) (interim rules), Federal Acquisition Regulation, Reform of Affirmative Action in Federal Procurement addressing the General Services Administration (GSA), NASA, and DoD.

NASA

Materiel Solutions Analysis (MSA)

Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction (TMRR)

Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD)

Production and Deployment (P&D): this includes start of (LRIP), Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E), transition to Full Rate Production/Full Deployment, and achievement of Initial Operational Capability (IOC)

Low Rate Initial Production

Operations and Sustainment (O&S): this includes achievement of (FOC) and continues out to the product's end-of-life and disposal

Full Operational Capability

Contract management[edit]

Contract administration[edit]

Contract administration tasks can include:

Wartime contracting[edit]

Allegations of waste and corruption in government procurement during wartime have led to special oversight measures being put in place. During World War II this function was provided by the bipartisan Truman Committee established in 1941. After allegations of contract fraud and waste were made regarding expenditure during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan was established, modelled on the Truman Committee.[63]

Contractor voice[edit]

One organization which provides a contractor perspective is the Coalition for Government Procurement (CGP), a non-profit association of commercial contractors.[64] The CGP is based in Washington, D.C. and is registered under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995.[65]

– useful in determining essential elements of an acquisition from a customer's perspective.

Conjoint analysis

Cost-plus contract

Economic conversion

Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act

Governmentwide acquisition contracts

Contract adjustment board

Defense Acquisition University

responsible for audits of many defense contractors

Defense Contract Audit Agency

responsible for contract administration of US Department of Defense contracts.

Defense Contract Management Agency

an example of an acquisition contract that expanded from its original narrow focus to serve the entire Government

NASA SEWP

No-bid contract

Small and medium enterprise

Top 100 US Federal Contractors

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Nash, Ralph Jr.; Cibinic, John Jr. (1993). Formation of Government Contracts (2nd ed.). George Washington University.  0-935165-07-X.

ISBN

Nash, Ralph Jr.; Cibinic, John Jr. (1995). Administration of Government Contracts (3rd ed.). Commerce Clearing House, Inc.  0-935165-32-0.

ISBN

Tiefer, Charles; Shook, William A. (2003). Government Contract Law (2nd ed.). Carolina Academic Press.  0-89089-437-X.

ISBN

J. Edward Murphy (2005). Guide to Contract Pricing: Cost and Price Analysis for Contractors, Subcontractors, and Government Agencies. Management Concepts.  1-56726-153-1.

ISBN

Oyer, Darrell J. (2005). Pricing and Cost Accounting: A Handbook for Government Contractors (2nd ed.). Management Concepts.  1-56726-164-7.

ISBN

Bednar, Richard J.; Braude, Herman M.; Cibinic, John Jr. (1991). Construction Contracting. George Washington University.  0-935165-18-5.

ISBN

Manos, Karen L. (2004). Government Contract Costs & Pricing. Thomson-West.

Vol. I –  0-314-11621-4
Vol. II – ISBN 0-314-11708-3

ISBN

Edwards, Vernon J. (2006). Source Selection Answer Book. Management Concepts, Inc.  1-56726-172-8.

ISBN

- official US Federal Government website of the Integrated Acquisition Environment, functioning under the auspices of OMB's Office of Federal Procurement Policy and the Chief Acquisition Officers Council

Acquisition.gov

Archived 2008-06-26 at the Wayback Machine provides information that explains how to become a federal contractor, how to find business opportunities, and the rules and regulations that federal contractors need to follow.

Business.gov

Federal Procurement Data System

FBI

Former U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Manager Sentenced to Six Years in Prison in Bribery and Kickback Scheme

PTACs provide local assistance for firms marketing products and services to the Federal, state and local governments

Procurement Technical Assistance Centers

Public Contract Law Journal

The official magazine of the National Institute of Governmental Purchasing (NIGP)

Government Procurement

U.S. Army Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School's Contract Attorneys Deskbook