Katana VentraIP

Grade (climbing)

Many climbing routes have a grade that reflects the technical difficulty—and in some cases the risks and commitment level—of the route. The first ascensionist can suggest a grade, but it will be amended to reflect the consensus view of subsequent ascents. While many countries with a strong tradition of climbing developed grading systems, a small number of grading systems have become internationally dominant for each type of climbing, which has contributed to the standardization of grades worldwide. Over the years, grades have consistently risen in all forms of climbing, helped by improvements in climbing technique and equipment.

This article is about classifying climbing routes. For the measure of steepness, see grade (slope).

In free climbing (i.e. climbing rock routes with no aid), the most widely used grading systems are the French numerical or sport system (e.g. f7c+), the American YDS system (e.g. 5.13a), and latterly the UIAA scale (e.g. IX+). These systems are focused on technical difficulty, which is the sole focus in the relatively risk-free activity of sport climbing. The American system adds an R/X suffix to traditional climbing routes to reflect the risks of climbing protection. Notable traditional climbing systems include the British E-grade system (e.g. E4 6a).


In bouldering (i.e. rock climbing on short routes), the most widely used systems are the American V-scale (or "Hueco") system (e.g. V14), and the French "Font" system (e.g. 8C+). The Font system often attaches an "F" prefix to further distinguish it from French sport climbing grades, which itself uses an "f" prefix (e.g. F8C+ vs. f8c+). It is increasingly common for sport climbing rock routes to describe their hardest technical movements in terms of their boulder grade (e.g. an f7a sport climbing route being described as having a V6 crux).


In aid climbing (i.e. the opposite of free climbing), the most widely used system is the A-grade system (e.g. A3+), which was recalibrated in the 1990s as the "new wave" system from the legacy A-grade system. For "clean aid climbing" (i.e. aid climbing equipment is used but only where the equipment is temporary and not permanently hammered into the rock), the most common system is the C-system (e.g. C3+). Aid climbing grades take time to stabilize as successive repeats of aid climbing routes can materially reduce the grade.


In ice climbing, the most widely used grading system is the WI ("water ice") system (e.g. WI6) and the identical AI ("alpine ice") system (e.g. AI6). The related sport of mixed climbing (i.e. ice and dry-tool climbing) uses the M-grade system (e.g. M8), with other notable mixed grading systems including the Scottish Winter system (e.g. Grade VII). Pure dry-tooling routes (i.e. ice tools with no ice) use the D-grade prefix (e.g. D8 instead of M8).


In mountaineering and alpine climbing, the greater complexity of routes requires several grades to reflect the difficulties of the various rock, ice, and mixed climbing challenges. The International French Adjectival System (IFAS, e.g.TD+)–which is identical to the "UIAA Scale of Overall Difficulty" (e.g. I–VI)–is used to grade the "overall" risk and difficulty of mountain routes (with the gradient of the snow/ice fields) (e.g. the 1938 Heckmair Route on the Eiger is graded: ED2 (IFAS), VI− (UIAA), A0 (A-grade), WI4 (WI-grade), 60° slope). The related "commitment grade" systems include the notable American National Climbing Classification System (e.g. I–VI).

German/Swiss Saxon scale (or Dresden scale, or East German scale). Developed at the start of the 20th century for the emerging , it was gradually adopted by other climbing areas in the region, such as Bohemian Switzerland, Bohemian Paradise, Lusatian Mountains, and the Zittau Mountains. While it uses Roman numerals, it is a separate system from the UIAA scale. As well as Roman numerals, the Saxon grades use the symbols "a", "b" and "c" for further refinement between numerals from grade VII onwards. Unlike the American YDS and French sport systems, the Saxon grading system is not purely focused on technical difficulties but is also based on "route length, the total psychological commitment, the placements distance, the risk, [and] the random stops";[2] it is thus not directly comparable to other systems.[2]

Saxon Switzerland climbing region

Japanese Dankyū system. Also known as the "kyū dan" system, is widely used in Japan, and is constructed in a way that resembles grading systems (see Dan and Kyu). Developed in the Japanese bouldering area of Ogawayama, the system begins at 10-kyū (easiest) and gets progressively harder as it counts down to 1-kyū. As with martial arts grading, after 1-kyū the system uses "black-belt grades" of 1-Dan (or shodan, "the first step"); 1-Dan is roughly equal to a V7 grade, while 6-Dan (or rokudan) is at V16.[14]

martial arts

Canadian Ice. Canadian ice climbs quote both the , with Roman numerals 1–7 for the "overall" challenges and risks, and a "technical scale" that uses Arabic levels 1–7 for the hardest movements. Other grades can be provided to reflect the mixed climbing (M-level), the thickness of the ice (R-level), and the fragility of the structure (X-level). In practice, Canadian Ice "technical grades" are equivalent to the WI-grade, but omit the "WI"; a typical route could be graded as III-4.[2][27]

Canadian Winter Commitment Grade

NCCS Grade I and Grade II: "Half a day or less for the technical (5th [i.e. grade] class) portion of the route".[25][26] Often listed as "1–3 hours" (for grade I), and "3–5 hours" (for grade II).[36]

Yosemite Decimal System

NCCS Grade III: "Most of a day of roped climbing".[26] Often listed as "5–8 hours".[36]

[25]

NCCS Grade IV: "A full day of technical climbing".[26] Often listed as "a full day".[36]

[25]

NCCS Grade V: "Typically requires an overnight on the route, or done fast and free in a day".[26] Grade V is often listed as "one very long day of climbing, or two full days of climbing".[36]

[25]

NCCS Grade VI: "Two or more days of hard climbing".[26] Often listed as "two days to a week".[36]

[25]

NCCS Grade VII: "Remote walls climbed in ".[25][26] Often listed as "more than a week of hard climbing in extreme (i.e. alpine) conditions".[36][3]

alpine style

Comparison tables[edit]

Free climbing[edit]

Free climbing systems can be broadly compared per the table below.[26][25][38] While most systems do not perfectly align, especially at the lower (or easier) grades, above the level of circa 5.12a (American YDS), f7a+ (French), VIII+, the risk-free sport climbing becomes the dominant free-climbing format and most grades closely align;[2][3] the exception being the traditional climbing focused British E-grade system.[7]

Beta (climbing)

History of rock climbing

Trail difficulty rating system

(2018). "Appendix A: Rating Systems". Mountaineering: The Freedom of the Hills (9th ed.). Quiller. ISBN 978-1846892622.

The Mountaineers

Mandelli, G; Angriman, A (2016). . Central School of Mountaineering, Club Alpino Italiano, Italy.

"Scales of Difficulty in Mountaineering"

Nick Draper; David Giles; Volker Schöffl; Franz Konstantin Fuss; Phillip Watts; et al. (October 2015). (PDF). Sports Technology. 8 (3–4): 88–94. doi:10.1080/19346182.2015.1107081. S2CID 111441279.

"Comparative grading scales, statistical analyses, climber descriptors and ability grouping"

. American Alpine Journal. 2013.

"International Grade Comparison Chart"

HardClimbs (June 2023)

Climbing Grades Explained

RockFax Publishing (2023)

RockFax Climbing Grade Conversions

MountainProject (2023)

International Climbing Grade Comparison Chart (Rock and Boulders)

theCrag (2023)

Grades and Grade Conversions

UIAA (2023)

UIAA Grades for Rock Climbing

Ari Paulin Base Camp Database (2023)

Grading of Climbs

International Rock Climbing Research Association (2015)

(Comparative Grades Table) Reporting Grades in Climbing Research