Authors[edit]

Interdependence theory was first introduced by Harold Kelley and John Thibaut in 1959 in their book, The Social Psychology of Groups.[4] This book drew inspiration from social exchange theory and game theory, and provided key definitions and concepts instrumental to the development of the interdependence framework.[2][4][1] In their second book, Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence,[5] the theory was completely formalized in 1978. Harold Kelley continued the development of Interdependence theory in 2003, with the book An Atlas of Interpersonal Situations[6]. This book expanded on the previous work by adding two additional dimensions to the dimensions of interdependence, as well as by analyzing 21 specific situation types.[1][2][6] In addition, the work of Kelly and Thibaut built on the work of Kurt Lewin, who first defined interdependence, and stated that ""The essence of a group is not the similarity or dissimilarity of its members, but their interdependence . . . A change in the state of any subpart changes the state of any other subpart . . . Every move of one member will, relatively speaking, deeply affect the other members, and the state of the group" (pp. 84–88).[7][1][4]

Four basic assumptions of interdependence theory[edit]

Principle of structure (the situation)[edit]

All interactions are set within the context of their given situation (known in Interdependence theory as structure). In order to best analyze this factor, Interdependence theory presents a taxonomy of situations that includes the six dimensions listed below. A key concept with the Principle of Structure is Affordance, or what the situation affords (makes possible) for the individuals within the interaction.[1][2]

Academic and practical applications[edit]

Interdependence theory has been used by academics to "analyze group dynamics, power and dependence, social comparison, conflict and cooperation, attribution and self-presentation, trust and distrust, emotions, love and commitment, coordination and communication, risk and self-regulation, performance and motivation, social development, and neuroscientific model of social interaction" (Van Lange & Balliet, 2014, p. 67).[1][6][13][14]


In addition, the theory provides a practical framework for understanding the underlying psychological factors that motivate other individuals in which you interact (in both personal and professional settings), as well as providing a framework for understanding the underlying psychological factors that motivate your own actions when interacting with others.

Goal-expectation theory

[15]

Structural goal-expectation theory

[16]

The individual–group discontinuity model

[17]

[18][19]

Game theory

Theories of Direct [8] and Indirect Reciprocity[20]

Reciprocity

Need-to-belong model

[21]

The investment model of commitment processes[23]

[22]

The model of communal (and exchange) orientations (in close relationships)

[24]

The empathy–altruism model (explaining altruism and prosocial behavior)

[25]

(applied to intergroup processes)[26]

Realistic conflict theory

The dual-concern model (applied in the domains of negotiation and bargaining)

[27]

[28][29][30]

Equity theory

Self-expansion approach

[31]

Social exchange theory

Sources:[3][2]

Equity theory

Interpersonal relationship

Prisoner's dilemma

Social exchange theory