James Dunn
26 June 2020 (aged 80)
British
Jimmy Dunn
The Baptism in the Holy Spirit[1] (1968)
Biblical studies
New Testament studies
The New Perspective on Paul (2007)
Dunn was born on 21 October 1939[8] in Birmingham, England.
He had the following degrees:
Dunn was licensed as a minister of the Church of Scotland in 1964.[9] He was chaplain to overseas students at Edinburgh University in 1968–70.[9]
In 1970, Dunn became a lecturer in divinity at the University of Nottingham,[9] and was promoted to reader in 1979.[9] Whilst at Nottingham, he served as a Methodist local preacher.[9]
He became Professor of Divinity at Durham University in 1982,[9] and in 1990 became Lightfoot Professor of Divinity at Durham.[10][11] He retired in 2003,[10] and was succeeded as Lightfoot Professor of Divinity by John M. G. Barclay.[12]
For 2002, Dunn was the President of the Studiorum Novi Testamenti Societas, an international body for New Testament study. Only three other British scholars had been made President of the body in the preceding 25 years. In 2006 he became a Fellow of the British Academy.[13]
In 2005 a Festschrift was published dedicated to Dunn, comprising articles by 27 New Testament scholars, examining early Christian communities and their beliefs about the Holy Spirit in Christianity.[14] In 2009 another Festschrift was dedicated to Dunn for his 70th birthday, consisting of two forewords by N. T. Wright and Richard B. Hays and 17 articles all written by his former students who went on to have successful careers in either academic and ministerial fields around the world.[15]
Dunn was especially associated with the New Perspective on Paul, along with N. T. Wright and E. P. Sanders.[16]
Dunn took up Sanders' project of redefining Palestinian Judaism in order to correct the Christian view of Judaism as a religion of works-righteousness. In his Parting of the Ways, Dunn highlighted four pillars of first-century Judaism as monotheism, election and land, Torah and Temple. One of the most important differences to Sanders is that Dunn perceives a fundamental coherence and consistency to Paul's thought. He furthermore criticizes Sanders' understanding of the term justification, arguing that Sanders' understanding suffers from an "individualizing exegesis".