Katana VentraIP

Lunar theory

Lunar theory attempts to account for the motions of the Moon. There are many small variations (or perturbations) in the Moon's motion, and many attempts have been made to account for them. After centuries of being problematic, lunar motion can now be modeled to a very high degree of accuracy (see section Modern developments).

Lunar theory includes:


Lunar theory has a history of over 2000 years of investigation. Its more modern developments have been used over the last three centuries for fundamental scientific and technological purposes, and are still being used in that way.

In the eighteenth century, comparison between lunar theory and observation was used to test by the motion of the lunar apogee.

Newton's law of universal gravitation

In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, navigational tables based on lunar theory, initially in the , were much used for the determination of longitude at sea by the method of lunar distances.

Nautical Almanac

In the very early twentieth century, comparison between lunar theory and observation was used in another test of gravitational theory, to test (and rule out) 's suggestion that a well-known discrepancy in the motion of the perihelion of Mercury might be explained by a fractional adjustment of the power -2 in Newton's inverse square law of gravitation[1] (the discrepancy was later successfully explained by the general theory of relativity).

Simon Newcomb

In the mid-twentieth century, before the development of atomic clocks, lunar theory and observation were used in combination to implement an astronomical time scale () free of the irregularities of mean solar time.

ephemeris time

In the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, modern developments of lunar theory are being used in the series of models of the Solar System, in conjunction with high-precision observations, to test the exactness of physical relationships associated with the general theory of relativity, including the strong equivalence principle, relativistic gravitation, geodetic precession, and the constancy of the gravitational constant.[2]

Jet Propulsion Laboratory Development Ephemeris

Applications of lunar theory have included the following:

Naburimannu

Kidinnu

Soudines

The Moon has been observed for millennia. Over these ages, various levels of care and precision have been possible, according to the techniques of observation available at any time. There is a correspondingly long history of lunar theories: it stretches from the times of the Babylonian and Greek astronomers, down to modern lunar laser ranging.


Among notable astronomers and mathematicians down the ages, whose names are associated with lunar theories, are:


Other notable mathematicians and mathematical astronomers also made significant contributions.


The history can be considered to fall into three parts: from ancient times to Newton; the period of classical (Newtonian) physics; and modern developments.

Ancient times to Newton[edit]

Babylon[edit]

Of Babylonian astronomy, practically nothing was known to historians of science before the 1880s.[3] Surviving ancient writings of Pliny had made bare mention of three astronomical schools in Mesopotamia – at Babylon, Uruk, and 'Hipparenum' (possibly 'Sippar').[4] But definite modern knowledge of any details only began when Joseph Epping deciphered cuneiform texts on clay tablets from a Babylonian archive: In these texts he identified an ephemeris of positions of the Moon.[5] Since then, knowledge of the subject, still fragmentary, has had to be built up by painstaking analysis of deciphered texts, mainly in numerical form, on tablets from Babylon and Uruk (no trace has yet been found of anything from the third school mentioned by Pliny).


To the Babylonian astronomer Kidinnu (in Greek or Latin, Kidenas or Cidenas) has been attributed the invention (5th or 4th century BC) of what is now called "System  B" for predicting the position of the moon, taking account that the moon continually changes its speed along its path relative to the background of fixed stars. This system involved calculating daily stepwise changes of lunar speed, up or down, with a minimum and a maximum approximately each month.[6] The basis of these systems appears to have been arithmetical rather than geometrical, but they did approximately account for the main lunar inequality now known as the equation of the center.


The Babylonians kept very accurate records for hundreds of years of new moons and eclipses.[7] Some time between the years 500 BC and 400 BC they identified and began to use the 19 year cyclic relation between lunar months and solar years now known as the Metonic cycle.[8]


This helped them build a numerical theory of the main irregularities in the Moon's motion, reaching remarkably good estimates for the (different) periods of the three most prominent features of the Moon's motion:

the mean motions or positions of the Moon and the Sun, together with three coefficients and three angular positions, which together define the shape and location of their apparent orbits:

the two eccentricities (, about 0.0549, and , about 0.01675) of the ellipses that approximate to the apparent orbits of the Moon and the Sun;

the angular direction of the perigees ( and ) (or their opposite points the apogees) of the two orbits; and

the angle of inclination (, mean value about 18523") between the planes of the two orbits, together with the direction () of the line of nodes in which those two planes intersect. The ascending node () is the node passed by the Moon when it is tending northwards relative to the ecliptic.

'AE 1871': , (London, 1867).

"Nautical Almanac & Astronomical Ephemeris" for 1871

E W Brown (1896). , Cambridge University Press.

An Introductory Treatise on the Lunar Theory

E W Brown. , Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society, 53 (1897), 39–116.

"Theory of the Motion of the Moon"

E W Brown. , Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society, 53 (1899), 163–202.

"Theory of the Motion of the Moon"

E W Brown. , Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society, 54 (1900), 1–63.

"Theory of the Motion of the Moon"

E W Brown. , Monthly Notes of the Royal Astronomical Society 63 (1903), 396–397.

"On the verification of the Newtonian law"

E W Brown. , Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society, 57 (1905), 51–145.

"Theory of the Motion of the Moon"

E W Brown. , Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society, 59 (1908), 1–103.

"Theory of the Motion of the Moon"

E W Brown (1919). , New Haven.

Tables of the Motion of the Moon

M Chapront-Touzé & J Chapront. , Astronomy & Astrophysics 124 (1983), 50–62.

"The lunar ephemeris ELP-2000"

M Chapront-Touzé & J Chapront: , Astronomy & Astrophysics 190 (1988), 342–352.

"ELP2000-85: a semi-analytical lunar ephemeris adequate for historical times"

M Chapront-Touzé & J Chapront, (Observatoire de Paris, 2002).

Analytical Ephemerides of the Moon in the 20th Century

J Chapront; M Chapront-Touzé; G Francou. , Astronomy & Astrophysics 387 (2002), 700–709.

"A new determination of lunar orbital parameters, precession constant and tidal acceleration from LLR measurements"

J Chapront & G Francou. , Astronomy & Astrophysics 404 (2003), 735–742.

"The lunar theory ELP revisited. Introduction of new planetary perturbations"

I B Cohen and Anne Whitman (1999). Isaac Newton: 'The Principia', a new translation, University of California Press. (For bibliographic details but no text, see .)

external link

J O Dickey; P L Bender; J E Faller; and others. , Science 265 (1994), pp. 482–490.

"Lunar Laser Ranging: A Continuing Legacy of the Apollo Program"

J L E Dreyer (1906). , Cambridge University Press, (later republished under the modified title "History of the Planetary Systems from Thales to Kepler").

A History of Astronomy from Thales to Kepler

W J Eckert et al. Improved Lunar Ephemeris 1952–1959: A Joint Supplement to the American Ephemeris and the (British) Nautical Almanac, (US Government Printing Office, 1954).

J Epping & J N Strassmaier. "Zur Entzifferung der astronomischen Tafeln der Chaldaer" ("On the deciphering of Chaldaean astronomical tables"), Stimmen aus Maria Laach, vol. 21 (1881), pp. 277–292.

'ESAE 1961': 'Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Ephemeris and the American Ephemeris and Nautical Almanac' ('prepared jointly by the Nautical Almanac Offices of the United Kingdom and the United States of America'), London (HMSO), 1961.

K Garthwaite; D B Holdridge & J D Mulholland. , Astronomical Journal 75 (1970), 1133.

"A preliminary special perturbation theory for the lunar motion"

H Godfray (1885). , London, (4th ed.).

Elementary Treatise on the Lunar Theory

Andrew Motte (1729a) (translator). "The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, by Sir Isaac Newton, translated into English", .

Volume I, containing Book 1

Andrew Motte (1729b) (translator). "The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, by Sir Isaac Newton, translated into English", (with Index, Appendix containing additional (Newtonian) proofs, and "The Laws of the Moon's Motion according to Gravity", by John Machin).

Volume II, containing Books 2 and 3

J D Mulholland & P J Shelus. , Moon 8 (1973), 532.

"Improvement of the numerical lunar ephemeris with laser ranging data"

O Neugebauer (1975). , (in 3 volumes), New York (Springer).

A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy

X X Newhall; E M Standish; J G Williams. , Astronomy and Astrophysics 125 (1983), 150.

"DE102: A numerically integrated ephemeris of the Moon and planets spanning forty-four centuries"

U S Naval Observatory (2009). Archived 2009-03-05 at the Wayback Machine.

"History of the Astronomical Almanac"

J G Williams et al. "Making solutions from lunar laser ranging data", Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society (1972), 4Q, 267.

J.G. Williams; S.G. Turyshev; & D.H. Boggs. , Physical Review Letters, 93 (2004), 261101.

"Progress in Lunar Laser Ranging Tests of Relativistic Gravity"

Quotations related to Lunar theory at Wikiquote