Katana VentraIP

Quality of life

Quality of life (QOL) is defined by the World Health Organization as "an individual's perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns".[1]

For other uses, see Quality of life (disambiguation).

Standard indicators of the quality of life include wealth, employment, the environment, physical and mental health, education, recreation and leisure time, social belonging, religious beliefs, safety, security and freedom.[2][3][4] QOL has a wide range of contexts, including the fields of international development, healthcare, politics and employment. Health related QOL (HRQOL) is an evaluation of QOL and its relationship with health.[5]

Beliefs and ideas

Creativity and recreation

Enquiry and learning

Gender and generations

Identity and engagement

Memory and projection

Well-being and health

One approach, called the engaged theory, outlined in the journal of Applied Research in the Quality of Life, posits four domains in assessing quality of life: ecology, economics, politics and culture.[6] In the domain of culture, for example, it includes the following subdomains of quality of life:


Under this conception, other frequently related concepts include freedom, human rights, and happiness. However, since happiness is subjective and difficult to measure, other measures are generally given priority. It has also been shown that happiness, as much as it can be measured, does not necessarily increase correspondingly with the comfort that results from increasing income.[7] As a result, standard of living should not be taken to be a measure of happiness.[2][8] Also, sometimes considered related is the concept of human security, though the latter may be considered at a more basic level and for all people.

In international development[edit]

Quality of life has been deemed an important concept in the field of international development because it allows development to be analyzed on a measure that is generally accepted as more comprehensive than standard of living. Within development theory, however, there are varying ideas concerning what constitutes desirable change for a particular society. The different ways that quality of life is defined by institutions, therefore, shape how these organizations work for its improvement as a whole.


Organisations such as the World Bank, for example, declare a goal of "working for a world free of poverty",[32] with poverty defined as a lack of basic human needs, such as food, water, shelter, freedom, access to education, healthcare, or employment.[33] In other words, poverty is defined as a low quality of life. Using this definition, the World Bank works towards improving quality of life through the stated goal of lowering poverty and helping people afford a better quality of life.


Other organizations, however, may also work towards improved global quality of life using a slightly different definition and substantially different methods. Many NGOs do not focus at all on reducing poverty on a national or international scale, but rather attempt to improve the quality of life for individuals or communities. One example would be sponsorship programs that provide material aid for specific individuals. Although many organizations of this type may still talk about fighting poverty, the methods are significantly different.


Improving quality of life involves action not only by NGOs but also by governments. Global health has the potential to achieve greater political presence if governments were to incorporate aspects of human security into foreign policy. Stressing individuals' basic rights to health, food, shelter, and freedom addresses prominent inter-sectoral problems negatively impacting today's society, and may lead to greater action and resources. Integration of global health concerns into foreign policy may be hampered by approaches that are shaped by the overarching roles of defense and diplomacy.[34]

Canadian Index of Wellbeing

Circles of Sustainability

Depression (mood)

Eudaimonia

Euthanasia

Flourishing

Happiness

Human security

Livability

Mental health

Positive psychology

Poverty

Occupational burnout

Quality of working life

Rational expectations

Rehabilitation psychology

Simple living

Social rejection

Subjective well-being

Well-being

Ezechieli, Eric (2003). . Stanford University.

Beyond Sustainable Development: Education for Gross National Happiness in Bhutan

Learning materials related to What Matters at Wikiversity

Archived 11 January 2022 at the Wayback Machine

Ethical Markets Quality of Life Indicators

Archived 7 December 2013 at the Wayback Machine

The First European Quality of Life Survey 2003

A research project on the quality of lives and work of European citizens

Quality of Life in a Changing Europe

European Environment Agency

Ensuring quality of life in Europe's cities and towns

Quality of Life Assessment Instruments – Centre for Health Economics, Monash University Australia

AQoL Instruments

(Shareware/Freeware) – An electronic questionnaire platform for MS Windows and Java with preconfigured adoptions of numerous important Quality-of-Life instruments (including SF-36, EORTC QLQ-C30) in multiple languages

The Quality-of-Life-Recorder

the official journal of the International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies

Applied Research in Quality of Life

the official journal of the International Society for Child Indicators

Child Indicators Research

an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care, and rehabilitation – official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research

Quality of Life Research

policy briefing on the value of refocusing development on 3D human wellbeing for pro-poor policy change, from the Institute of Development Studies, UK.

After 2015: '3D Human Wellbeing'

Mercer Quality of Living survey

Basic Guide to the World: Quality of Life Throughout the World

Family database, OECD