Katana VentraIP

Special pleading

Special pleading is an informal fallacy wherein one cites something as an exception to a general or universal principle, without justifying the special exception.[1][2][3][4][5] It is the application of a double standard.[6][7]

This article is about the informal fallacy. For the legal concept, see Special pleader.

In the classic distinction among material fallacies, cognitive fallacies, and formal fallacies, special pleading most likely falls within the category of a cognitive fallacy, because it would seem to relate to "lip service", rationalization, and diversion (abandonment of discussion). Special pleading also often resembles the "appeal to" logical fallacies.[8][9]


In medieval philosophy, it was not presumed that wherever a distinction is claimed, a relevant basis for the distinction should exist and be substantiated. Special pleading subverts a presumption of existential import.

[4]

[5]

[10]

A difficult case is when a possible criticism is made relatively immune to investigation. This immunity may take the forms of:

Statistical[edit]

This variation occurs when the interpretation of the relevant statistic is "massaged" by looking for ways to reclassify or requantify data from one portion of results, but not applying the same scrutiny to other categories.[11]

Ad hoc hypothesis

Cherry picking (fallacy)

Courtier's reply

Exception that proves the rule

Hard cases make bad law

Moving the goalposts

No true Scotsman

Relativist fallacy

Special pleading at the Fallacy Files

Archived 2012-10-19 at the Wayback Machine

Special pleading at the Nizkor Project