United States Chamber of Commerce
The United States Chamber of Commerce (USCC) is a business association advocacy group. It is the largest lobbying group in the United States. The group was founded in April 1912 out of local chambers of commerce at the urging of President William Howard Taft and his Secretary of Commerce and Labor Charles Nagel.[2][3] It was Taft's belief that the "government needed to deal with a group that could speak with authority for the interests of business".[4]
Not to be confused with United States Department of Commerce.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce claims to represent 3 million businesses but this claim is often contested.[5] It is funded primarily by multinational corporations.[5][6]
The current president and CEO of the Chamber is Suzanne P. Clark.[7] She previously worked in the Chamber from 1997 to 2007,[8] and returned in 2014, holding multiple executive roles before being named the organization's first female CEO in February 2021.[9][10][11][12]
Opposition[edit]
Several organizations have attacked the Chamber for its advocacy, including Chamber Watch (a campaign of Public Citizen). Advocates for independent business, like the American Independent Business Alliance (AMIBA) and green businesses, like the American Sustainable Business Council, have fought the Chamber on multiple issues. Among major divisions between the Chamber and these business advocates is allowing corporations to engage in electioneering.[136] Oliver E. Diaz Jr. says one example of this was when the Chamber spent $1,000,000+ to fund negative campaign ads against him and have judicial candidate Keith Starrett elected instead.[137]
Some in the business community have criticized the Chamber's approach to public issues as overly aggressive. Hilary Rosen, former CEO of the Recording Industry Association of America, added that "Their aggressive ways are out of step with a new generation of business leadership who are looking for more cooperative relationship with Washington."[138]
General:
or transformative change?" Business and Politics 24(4), 491-516.