Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) is an international agreement that regulates treaties among sovereign states.
$_$_$DEEZ_NUTS#0__titleDEEZ_NUTS$_$_$
$_$_$DEEZ_NUTS#0__subtitleDEEZ_NUTS$_$_$
Known as the "treaty on treaties", the VCLT establishes comprehensive, operational guidelines, rules, and procedures for how treaties are drafted, defined, amended, and interpreted.[3] An international treaty is a written agreement between countries subject to international law that stipulates their consent to the creation, alteration, or termination of their rights and obligations, as stipulated in the treaty.[4]
The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties was adopted and opened to signature on 23 May 1969,[5][1] became effective on 27 January 1980,[1] and has been ratified by 116 sovereign states as of January 2018.[2] Non-ratifying parties, such as the U.S, have recognized parts of the VCLT as a restatement of customary international law.[6] In treaty law, the VCLT is the authority for resolving disputes about the interpretation of a treaty.[7]
History[edit]
The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) was drafted by the International Law Commission (ILC) of the United Nations, which began work on the convention in 1949.[5] During the 20 years of preparation, several draft versions of the convention and commentaries were prepared by special rapporteurs of the ILC, which included prominent international law scholars James Brierly, Hersch Lauterpacht, Gerald Fitzmaurice, and Humphrey Waldock.[5]
In 1966, the ILC adopted 75 draft articles, which formed the basis for its final work.[8] Over two sessions in 1968 and 1969, the Vienna Conference completed the convention, which was adopted on 22 May 1969 and opened for signature on the following day.[5][8]
Content and effects[edit]
In the practices of international law, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties is the legal authority about the formation and effects of a treaty.[9] The legal standing of the VCLT is recognised by non-signator countries, such as the U.S. and India, as legally binding upon all sovereign states[6] who have recognised the customary-law status of the Vienna Convention.[10]
The VCLT defines a treaty as "an international agreement concluded between [sovereign] states in written form and governed by international law", and affirms that "every state possesses the capacity to conclude treaties." Article 1 of the VCLT restricts the application of the convention to written treaties between states, excluding treaties concluded between the states and international organizations or between international organizations. Article 11 defines "means of expressing consent to be bound by a treaty" including ratification, acceptance, approval or accession. Article 26 defines pacta sunt servanda, that agreements must be kept; Article 53 defines jus cogens, peremptory norm; Article 62 defines Fundamental Change of Circumstance, which determines the validity or invalidity of a treaty; and Article 77 defines depositary, the organisation or person who holds a multilateral treaty.
Scope[edit]
The Vienna Convention applies only to treaties agreed after the VCLT was ratified, and to treaties agreed between sovereign states, but does not govern other agreements between sovereign states and international organizations, or between international organizations, if any VCLT rules are independently binding upon such international organizations.[11] In practise, Article 2 and Article 5 of the Vienna Convention apply to treaties between sovereign states and an intergovernmental organization.[12]
However, agreements between states and international organizations or between international organizations themselves are governed by the 1986 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations or Between International Organizations if it enters into force. Furthermore, in treaties between states and international organizations, the terms of the Convention still apply between the state members.[11] The Convention does not apply to unwritten agreements.[11]
Vienna formula[edit]
Signature, ratification and accession[edit]
International treaties and conventions contain rules about what entities could sign, ratify or accede to them. Some treaties are restricted to states that are members of the UN or parties to the Statute of the International Court of Justice. In rare cases, there is an explicit list of the entities that the treaty is restricted to. More commonly, the aim of the negotiating states[13] (most or all of which usually end up becoming the founding signatories) is that the treaty is not restricted to particular states and so a wording like "this treaty is open for signature to States willing to accept its provisions" is used (the "all states formula"[14]).
In the case of regional organizations, such as the Council of Europe or the Organization of American States, the set of negotiating states that once agreed upon may sign and ratify the treaty is usually limited to its own member states, and non-member states may accede to it later.[15] However, sometimes a specific set of non-member states or non-state actors may be invited to join negotiations. For example, the Council of Europe invited the "non-member States" Canada, the Holy See (Vatican City), Japan, Mexico and the United States to "participate in the elaboration" of the 2011 Istanbul Convention and specifically allowed the European Union (described as an "International Organisation", rather than a "State") to sign and ratify the convention, rather than accede to it, and "other non-member States" were allowed only accession.[16][17]
The act of signing and ratifying a treaty as a negotiating state has the same effect as the act of acceding to a treaty (or "acceding a treaty") by a state that was not involved in its negotiation.[13] Usually, accessions occur only after the treaty has entered into force, but the UN Secretary-General has occasionally accepted accessions even before a treaty went into force.[13] The only downside of not being a negotiating state is that one has no influence over the contents of a treaty, but one is still allowed to declare reservations concerning specific provisions of the treaty that one wishes to accede to (Article 19).
Statehood question[edit]
When a treaty is open to "States", it may be difficult or impossible for the depositary authority[18] to determine which entities are States. If the treaty is restricted to Members of the United Nations or Parties to the Statute of the International Court of Justice, there is no ambiguity. However, a difficulty has occurred as to possible participation in treaties when entities that appeared otherwise to be States could not be admitted to the United Nations or become Parties to the Statute of the International Court of Justice because of the opposition for political reasons of a permanent member of the Security Council or have not applied for ICJ or UN membership. Since that difficulty did not arise as concerns membership in the specialized agencies, on which there is no "veto" procedure, a number of those States became members of specialized agencies and so were in essence recognized as States by the international community. Accordingly, to allow for as wide a participation as possible, several conventions then provided that they were also open for participation to state members of specialized agencies. The type of entry-into-force clause used in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties was later called the "Vienna formula," and various treaties, and conventions used its wording and organizations.[19]
Some treaties that use it include provisions that in addition to these States any other State invited by a specified authority or organization (commonly the United Nations General Assembly or an institution created by the treaty in question) can also participate, thus making the scope of potential signatories even broader.
Interpretation of treaties[edit]
Articles 31-33 of the VCLT entail principles for interpreting conventions, treaties, etc. These principles are recognized as representing customary international law, for example by the International Law Commission (ILC).[20]
The interpretational principles codified in Article 31 are to be used before applying those of Article 32, which explicitly states that it offers supplementary means of interpretation.
The European Court of Justice has also applied the interpretational provisions of the VCLT in different cases, including the Bosphorus Queen Case (2018),[21] in which the court interpreted the extent of the term "any resources" in Article 220(6) of UNCLOS.[22]
The VCLT is often relied upon in investment arbitration cases.[23]