Katana VentraIP

Almost everywhere

In measure theory (a branch of mathematical analysis), a property holds almost everywhere if, in a technical sense, the set for which the property holds takes up nearly all possibilities. The notion of "almost everywhere" is a companion notion to the concept of measure zero, and is analogous to the notion of almost surely in probability theory.

More specifically, a property holds almost everywhere if it holds for all elements in a set except a subset of measure zero,[1][2] or equivalently, if the set of elements for which the property holds is conull. In cases where the measure is not complete, it is sufficient that the set be contained within a set of measure zero. When discussing sets of real numbers, the Lebesgue measure is usually assumed unless otherwise stated.


The term almost everywhere is abbreviated a.e.;[3] in older literature p.p. is used, to stand for the equivalent French language phrase presque partout.[4]


A set with full measure is one whose complement is of measure zero. In probability theory, the terms almost surely, almost certain and almost always refer to events with probability 1 not necessarily including all of the outcomes. These are exactly the sets of full measure in a probability space.


Occasionally, instead of saying that a property holds almost everywhere, it is said that the property holds for almost all elements (though the term almost all can also have other meanings).

Definition[edit]

If is a measure space, a property is said to hold almost everywhere in if there exists a set with , and all have the property .[5] Another common way of expressing the same thing is to say that "almost every point satisfies ", or that "for almost every , holds".


It is not required that the set has measure 0; it may not belong to . By the above definition, it is sufficient that be contained in some set that is measurable and has measure 0.

If property holds almost everywhere and implies property , then property holds almost everywhere. This follows from the of measures.

monotonicity

If is a finite or a countable sequence of properties, each of which holds almost everywhere, then their conjunction holds almost everywhere. This follows from the of measures.

countable sub-additivity

By contrast, if is an uncountable family of properties, each of which holds almost everywhere, then their conjunction does not necessarily hold almost everywhere. For example, if is Lebesgue measure on and is the property of not being equal to (i.e. is true if and only if ), then each holds almost everywhere, but the conjunction does not hold anywhere.

As a consequence of the first two properties, it is often possible to reason about "almost every point" of a measure space as though it were an ordinary point rather than an abstraction. This is often done implicitly in informal mathematical arguments. However, one must be careful with this mode of reasoning because of the third bullet above: universal quantification over uncountable families of statements is valid for ordinary points but not for "almost every point".

If f : RR is a function and almost everywhere, then

for all real numbers with equality if and only if almost everywhere.

Lebesgue integrable

If f : [a, b] → R is a , then f is differentiable almost everywhere.

monotonic function

If f : RR is and

for all real numbers , then there exists a set E (depending on f) such that, if x is in E, the Lebesgue mean
converges to f(x) as decreases to zero. The set E is called the Lebesgue set of f. Its complement can be proved to have measure zero. In other words, the Lebesgue mean of f converges to f almost everywhere.

Lebesgue measurable

A bounded f : [a, b] → R is Riemann integrable if and only if it is continuous almost everywhere.

function

As a curiosity, the decimal expansion of almost every real number in the interval [0, 1] contains the complete text of , encoded in ASCII; similarly for every other finite digit sequence, see Normal number.

Shakespeare's plays

a function that is equal to 0 almost everywhere.

Dirichlet's function

Billingsley, Patrick (1995). Probability and measure (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.  0-471-00710-2.

ISBN