
Cognitive disengagement syndrome
Cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS) is an attention syndrome characterised by prominent dreaminess, mental fogginess, hypoactivity, sluggishness, slow reaction time, staring frequently, inconsistent alertness, and a slow working speed. To scientists in the field, it has reached the threshold of evidence and recognition as a distinct syndrome.[2]
Cognitive disengagement syndrome
Sluggish cognitive tempo (outdated)
- Inattention
- daydreaming
- mental fog
- mind wandering
- slow information processing
- frequent confusion
- slow reaction time
Permanent
Genetics and to a lesser extent, environmental factors
Medication, accommodations
5.1% (hypothesized[1])
Since 1798, the medical literature on disorders of attention has distinguished between at least two kinds, one a disorder of distractibility, lack of sustained attention, and poor inhibition (that is now known as ADHD) and the other a disorder of low power, arousal, or oriented/selective attention (now known as CDS).[3]
Although it implicates attention, CDS is distinct from ADHD. Unlike ADHD, which is the result of deficient executive functioning and self-regulation,[4][5][6] CDS presents with problems in arousal, maladaptive daydreaming, and oriented or selective attention (distinguishing what is important from unimportant in information that has to be processed rapidly), as opposed to poor persistence or sustained attention, inhibition and self-regulation.[7] In educational settings, CDS tends to result in decreased work accuracy, while ADHD impairs productivity.[8]
CDS can also occur as a comorbidity with ADHD in some people, leading to substantially higher impairment than when either condition occurs alone.
In contemporary science today, it is clear that this set of symptoms is important because it is associated with unique impairments, above and beyond ADHD. CDS independently has a negative impact on functioning (such as a diminished quality of life,[9] increased stress and suicidal behaviour,[10] as well as lower educational attainment and socioeconomic status[11]). CDS is clinically relevant as multiple randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) have shown that it responds poorly to methylphenidate.[12][13][14][15]
Originally, CDS was thought to represent about one in three persons with the inattentive presentation of ADHD,[16] as a psychiatric misdiagnosis, and to be incompatible with hyperactivity. New studies found that it can be comorbid with ADHD – and present in individuals without ADHD as well. Therefore, some psychologists and psychiatrists view it as a separate mental disorder. Others dismiss it altogether or believe it is a distinct symptom group within ADHD (like Hyperactivity, Impulsivity or Inattention). It even may be useful as an overarching concept that cuts across different psychiatric disorders (much like emotional dysregulation, for example).[17]
If CDS and ADHD coexist together, the problems are additive: Those with both (ADHD + CDS) had higher levels of impairment and inattention than adults with ADHD only,[18] and were more likely to be unmarried, out of work or on disability.[19] CDS alone is also present in the population and can be quite impairing in educational and occupational settings, even if it is not as pervasively impairing as ADHD. The studies on medical treatments are limited, however, research suggests that atomoxetine[20][21][22][23] and lisdexamfetamine[20][24] may be used to treat CDS.
The condition was previously called Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT). The terms concentration deficit disorder (CDD) or cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS) have recently been preferred to SCT because they better and more accurately explain the condition and thus eliminate confusion.[19][25]
Causes[edit]
Unlike ADHD, the general causes of CDS symptoms are almost unknown, though one recent study of twins suggested that the condition appears to be nearly as heritable or genetically influenced in nature as ADHD.[39]
Little is known about the neurobiology of CDS. However, symptoms of CDS seem to indicate that the posterior attention networks may be more involved here than the prefrontal cortex region of the brain and difficulties with working memory so prominent in ADHD. This hypothesis gained greater support following a 2015 neuroimaging study comparing ADHD inattentive symptoms and CDS symptoms in adolescents: It found that CDS was associated with a decreased activity in the left superior parietal lobule (SPL), whereas inattentive symptoms were associated with other differences in activation.[40] A 2018 study showed an association between CDS and specific parts of the frontal lobes, differing from classical ADHD neuroanatomy.[41]
A study showed a small link between thyroid functioning and CDS symptoms suggesting that thyroid dysfunction is not the cause of CDS. High rates of CDS were observed in children who had prenatal alcohol exposure and in survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, where they were associated with cognitive late effects.[42][43][44]
Diagnosis[edit]
Cognitive disengagement syndrome is not included as a diagnosis in the current DSM (2013) and ICD (2022), either by its current name or as the outdated 'sluggish cognitive tempo',[45][46] although it may be in subsequent versions; to scientists in the field, it has reached the threshold of evidence and recognition as a distinct syndrome[2] and is diagnosed by some professional practices.[47] Screening tools have been created to assess CDS symptoms.[29][48] Although some symptoms of other conditions are partially shared with CDS, they are distinct conditions.[49]
Treatment[edit]
Treatment of CDS has not been well investigated. Initial drug studies were done only with the ADHD medication methylphenidate, and even then only with children who were diagnosed as ADD without hyperactivity (using DSM-III criteria) and not specifically for CDS. The research seems to have found that most children with ADD (attention deficit disorder) with Hyperactivity (currently ADHD combined presentation) responded well at medium-to-high doses.[38] However, a sizable percentage of children with ADD without hyperactivity (currently ADHD inattentive presentation, therefore the results may apply to CDS) did not gain much benefit from methylphenidate, and when they did benefit, it was at a much lower dose.[50]
However, one study and a retrospective analysis of medical histories found that the presence or absence of CDS symptoms made no difference in response to methylphenidate in children with ADHD-I.[51][19] These studies did not specifically and explicitly examine the effect of the drug on CDS symptoms in children. Atomoxetine may be used to treat CDS,[20] as multiple randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) have found that it is an effective treatment.[20][21][23] In contrast, multiple other RCTs have shown that it responds poorly to methylphenidate.[52][53][54][55]
Only one study has investigated the use of behavior modification methods at home and school for children with predominantly CDS symptoms and it found good success.[56]
In April 2014, The New York Times reported that sluggish cognitive tempo is the subject of pharmaceutical company clinical drug trials, including ones by Eli Lilly that proposed that one of its biggest-selling drugs, Strattera, could be prescribed to treat proposed symptoms of sluggish cognitive tempo.[57] Other researchers believe that there is no effective treatment for CDS.[58]
Prognosis[edit]
The prognosis of CDS is unknown. In contrast, much is known about the adolescent and adult outcomes of children having ADHD. Those with CDS symptoms typically show a later onset of their symptoms than do those with ADHD, perhaps by as much as a year or two later on average. Both groups had similar levels of learning problems and inattention, but CDS children had less externalizing symptoms and higher levels of unhappiness, anxiety/depression, withdrawn behavior, and social dysfunction. They do not have the same risks for oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, or social aggression and thus may have different life course outcomes compared to children with ADHD-HI and Combined subtypes who have far higher risks for these other "externalizing" disorders.[19]
However, unlike ADHD, there are no longitudinal studies of children with CDS that can shed light on the developmental course and adolescent or adult outcomes of these individuals.
Epidemiology[edit]
Recent studies indicate that the symptoms of CDS in children form two dimensions: daydreamy-spacey and sluggish-lethargic, and that the former are more distinctive of the disorder from ADHD than the latter.[59][60] This same pattern was recently found in the first study of adults with CDS by Barkley and also in more recent studies of college students.[19] These studies indicated that CDS is probably not a subtype of ADHD but a distinct disorder from it. Yet it is one that overlaps with ADHD in 30–50% of cases of each disorder, suggesting a pattern of comorbidity between two related disorders rather than subtypes of the same disorder. Nevertheless, CDS is strongly correlated with ADHD inattentive and combined subtypes.[59][61] According to a Norwegian study, "[CDS] correlated significantly with inattentiveness, regardless of the subtype of ADHD."[62]
Controversy[edit]
Significant skepticism has been raised within the medical and scientific communities as to whether CDS, currently considered a "symptom cluster," actually exists as a distinct disorder.[57]
Allen Frances, emeritus professor of psychiatry at Duke University, argues: "We're seeing a fad in evolution: Just as ADHD has been the diagnosis du jour for 15 years or so, this is the beginning of another. This is a public health experiment on millions of kids...I have no doubt there are kids who meet the criteria for this thing, but nothing is more irrelevant. The enthusiasts here are thinking of missed patients. What about the mislabeled kids who are called patients when there's nothing wrong with them? They are not considering what is happening in the real world."[57]
UCLA researcher and Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology editorial board member Steve S. Lee expresses concern that based on CDS's close relationship to ADHD, a pattern of overdiagnosis of the latter has "already grown to encompass too many children with common youthful behavior, or whose problems are derived not from a neurological disorder but from inadequate sleep, a different learning disability or other sources." Lee states: "The scientist part of me says we need to pursue knowledge, but we know that people will start saying their kids have [cognitive disengagement syndrome], and doctors will start diagnosing it and prescribing for it long before we know whether it's real...ADHD has become a public health, societal question, and it's a fair question to ask of [CDS]."[57]
Adding to the controversy are potential conflicts of interest among the condition's proponents, including the funding of prominent CDS researchers' work by the global pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly.[57] When referring to the "increasing clinical referrals occurring now and more rapidly in the near future driven by increased awareness of the general public in [CDS]", Dr. Barkley writes: "The fact that [CDS] is not recognized as yet in any official taxonomy of psychiatric disorders will not alter this circumstance given the growing presence of information on [CDS] at various widely visited internet sites such as YouTube and Wikipedia, among others."[70]