Katana VentraIP

Conflict resolution

Conflict resolution is conceptualized as the methods and processes involved in facilitating the peaceful ending of conflict and retribution. Committed group members attempt to resolve group conflicts by actively communicating information about their conflicting motives or ideologies to the rest of group (e.g., intentions; reasons for holding certain beliefs) and by engaging in collective negotiation.[1] Dimensions of resolution typically parallel the dimensions of conflict in the way the conflict is processed. Cognitive resolution is the way disputants understand and view the conflict, with beliefs, perspectives, understandings and attitudes. Emotional resolution is in the way disputants feel about a conflict, the emotional energy. Behavioral resolution is reflective of how the disputants act, their behavior.[2] Ultimately a wide range of methods and procedures for addressing conflict exist, including negotiation, mediation, mediation-arbitration,[3] diplomacy, and creative peacebuilding.[4][5]

For other uses, see Conflict resolution (disambiguation).

Dispute resolution is conflict resolution limited to law, such as arbitration and litigation processes.[6] The concept of conflict resolution can be thought to encompass the use of nonviolent resistance measures by conflicted parties in an attempt to promote effective resolution.[7]

Contradictions – The concept is that the contrary has the characteristics of its opposite. People can seek to be in a relationship but still need their space.

Totality – The totality comes when the opposites unite. Thus, the relationship is balanced with contradictions and only then it reaches totality

Process – Comprehended through various social processes. These processes simultaneously continue within a relationship in a recurring manner.

Praxis – The relationship progresses with experience and both people interact and communicate effectively to meet their needs. Praxis is a concept of practicability in making decisions in a relationship despite opposing wants and needs

Between organizations[edit]

Relationships between organizations, such as strategic alliances, buyer-supplier partnerships, organizational networks, or joint ventures are prone to conflict. Conflict resolution in inter-organizational relationships has attracted the attention of business and management scholars. They have related the forms of conflict (e.g., integrity-based vs. competence-based conflict) to the mode of conflict resolution[44] and the negotiation and repair approaches used by organizations. They have also observed the role of important moderating factors such as the type of contractual arrangement,[45] the level of trust between organizations,[46] or the type of power asymmetry.[47]

In animals[edit]

Conflict resolution has also been studied in non-humans, including dogs, cats, monkeys, snakes, elephants, and primates.[54] Aggression is more common among relatives and within a group than between groups. Instead of creating distance between the individuals, primates tend to be more intimate in the period after an aggressive incident. These intimacies consist of grooming and various forms of body contact. Stress responses, including increased heart rates, usually decrease after these reconciliatory signals. Different types of primates, as well as many other species who live in groups, display different types of conciliatory behavior. Resolving conflicts that threaten the interaction between individuals in a group is necessary for survival, giving it a strong evolutionary value. A further focus of this is among species that have stable social units, individual relationships, and the potential for intragroup aggression that may disrupt beneficial relationships. The role of these reunions in negotiating relationships is examined along with the susceptibility of these relationships to partner value asymmetries and biological market effects.[55] These findings contradict previous existing theories about the general function of aggression, i.e. creating space between individuals (first proposed by Konrad Lorenz), which seems to be more the case in conflicts between groups than it is within groups.


In addition to research in primates, biologists are beginning to explore reconciliation in other animals. Until recently, the literature dealing with reconciliation in non-primates has consisted of anecdotal observations and very little quantitative data. Although peaceful post-conflict behavior had been documented going back to the 1960s, it was not until 1993 that Rowell made the first explicit mention of reconciliation in feral sheep. Reconciliation has since been documented in spotted hyenas,[56][57] lions, bottlenose dolphins,[58] dwarf mongoose, domestic goats,[59] domestic dogs,[60] and, recently, in red-necked wallabies.[61]

Education[edit]

Universities worldwide offer programs of study pertaining to conflict research, analysis, and practice. Conrad Grebel University College at the University of Waterloo has the oldest-running peace and conflict studies (PACS) program in Canada.[62] PACS can be taken as an Honors, 4-year general, or 3-year general major, joint major, minor, and diploma. Grebel also offers an interdisciplinary Master of Peace and Conflict Studies professional program. The Cornell University ILR School houses the Scheinman Institute on Conflict Resolution, which offers undergraduate, graduate, and professional training on conflict resolution.[63] It also offers dispute resolution concentrations for its MILR, JD/MILR, MPS, and MS/PhD graduate degree programs.[64] At the graduate level, Eastern Mennonite University's Center for Justice and Peacebuilding offers a Master of Arts in Conflict Transformation, a dual Master of Divinity/MA in Conflict Transformation degree, and several graduate certificates.[65] EMU also offers an accelerated 5-year BA in Peacebuilding and Development/MA in Conflict Transformation. Additional graduate programs are offered at Columbia University, Georgetown University, Johns Hopkins University, Creighton University, the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, and Trinity College Dublin.[66] George Mason University's Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter School for Peace and Conflict Resolution offers BA, BS, MS, and PhD degrees in Conflict Analysis and Resolution, as well as an undergraduate minor, graduate certificates, and joint degree programs.[67] Nova Southeastern University also offers a PhD in Conflict Analysis & Resolution, in both online and on-campus formats.[68]


Conflict resolution is a growing area of interest in UK pedagogy, with teachers and students both encouraged to learn about mechanisms that lead to aggressive action and those that lead to peaceful resolution. The University of Law, one of the oldest common law training institutions in the world, offers a legal-focused master's degree in conflict resolution as an LL.M. (Conflict resolution).[69]


Tel Aviv University offers two graduate degree programs in the field of conflict resolution, including the English-language International Program in Conflict Resolution and Mediation, allowing students to learn in a geographic region which is the subject of much research on international conflict resolution.


The Nelson Mandela Center for Peace & Conflict Resolution at Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi, is one of the first centers for peace and conflict resolution to be established at an Indian university. It offers a two-year full-time MA course in Conflict Analysis and Peace-Building, as well as a PhD in Conflict and Peace Studies.[70]


In Sweden Linnaeus University, Lund University and Uppsala University offer programs on bachelor, master and/or doctoral level in Peace and Conflict Studies.[71][72][73] Uppsala University also hosts its own Department of Peace and Conflict Research, among other things occupied with running the conflict database UCDP (Uppsala Conflict Data Program).[73][74]

Center for the Study of Genocide, Conflict Resolution, and Human Rights

is a London organisation that promotes peacebuilding as an alternative to military security

Conscience: Taxes for Peace not War

Crisis Management Initiative (CMI)

Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research

Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center

Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter School for Peace and Conflict Resolution

is one of the world's largest non-government organisations dedicated to conflict resolution

Search for Common Ground

develops and empowers young leaders from regions of conflict to work towards peace through coexistence

Seeds of Peace

is a global non-governmental organization and youth network dedicated to the role of youth in peacebuilding and conflict resolution

United Network of Young Peacebuilders (UNOY)

is a United Nations mandated organization and graduate school dedicated to conflict resolution and peace studies

University for Peace

is an academic data collection project that provides descriptions of political violence and conflict resolution

Uppsala Conflict Data Program

A Symposium on at Kaivalyadhama, India

Conflict Resolution – Internal and External

Augsburger, D. (1992). Conflict mediation across cultures. Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster / John Knox Press.

Bannon, I. & Paul Collier (Eds.). (2003). Natural resources and violent conflict: Options and actions. Washington, D.C: The World Bank.

Ury, F. & Rodger Fisher. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York, NY: Penguin Group.

Wilmot, W. & Jouyce Hocker. (2007). Interpersonal conflict. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.

Bercovitch, Jacob and Jackson, Richard. 2009. Archived 8 June 2010 at the Wayback Machine University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

Conflict Resolution in the Twenty-first Century: Principles, Methods, and Approaches.

de Waal, Frans B. M. and Angeline van Roosmalen. 1979. Reconciliation and consolation among chimpanzees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 5: 55–66.

de Waal, Frans B. M. 1989. Peacemaking Among Primates. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Judge, Peter G.; de Waal, Frans B.M. (1993). "Conflict avoidance among rhesus monkeys: coping with short-term crowding". Animal Behaviour. 46 (2): 221–232. :10.1006/anbe.1993.1184. S2CID 53175846.

doi

Veenema, Hans; et al. (1994). "Methodological improvements for the study of reconciliation". Behavioural Processes. 31 (1): 29–38. :10.1016/0376-6357(94)90035-3. PMID 24897415. S2CID 25126127.

doi

de Waal, Frans B. M. and Filippo Aureli. 1996. Consolation, reconciliation, and a possible cognitive difference between macaques and chimpanzees. Reaching into thought: The minds of the great apes (Eds. Anne E. Russon, Kim A. Bard, Sue Taylor Parker), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY: 80–110.

Aureli, Filippo (1997). "Post-conflict anxiety in non-human primates: the mediating role of emotion in conflict resolution". Aggressive Behavior. 23 (5): 315–328. :10.1002/(sici)1098-2337(1997)23:5<315::aid-ab2>3.0.co;2-h.

doi

Castles, Duncan L.; Whiten, Andrew (1998). "Post-conflict behaviour of wild olive baboons, I. Reconciliation, redirection, and consolation". Ethology. 104 (2): 126–147. :10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00057.x.

doi

Aureli, Filippo and Frans B. M. de Waal, eds. 2000. Natural Conflict Resolution. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

de Waal, Frans B. M. 2000. Primates––A natural heritage of conflict resolution. Science 289: 586–590.

Hicks, Donna. 2011. Yale University Press

Dignity: The Essential Role It Plays in Resolving Conflict.

(2002). "The form and function of reconciliation in primates". Annual Review of Anthropology. 31: 21–44. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.032902.101743.

Silk, Joan B.

Weaver, Ann; de Waal, Frans B. M. (2003). "The mother-offspring relationship as a template in social development: reconciliation in captive brown capuchins (Cebus apella)". Journal of Comparative Psychology. 117 (1): 101–110. :10.1037/0735-7036.117.1.101. PMID 12735370. S2CID 9632420.

doi

Palagi, Elisabetta; et al. (2004). "Reconciliation and consolation in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus)". American Journal of Primatology. 62 (1): 15–30. :10.1002/ajp.20000. PMID 14752810. S2CID 22452710.

doi

Palagi, Elisabetta; et al. (2005). "Aggression and reconciliation in two captive groups of Lemur catta". International Journal of Primatology. 26 (2): 279–294. :10.1007/s10764-005-2925-x. S2CID 22639928.

doi

Lorenzen, Michael. 2006. Conflict Resolution and Academic Library Instruction. LOEX Quarterly 33, no. 1/2: 6–9, 11.

Winslade, John & Monk, Gerald. 2000. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.

Narrative Mediation: A New Approach to Conflict Resolution.

(Ed.) (2004). From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation. Oxford University Press

Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov

Tesler, Pauline. 2001, 2008. Collaborative Law: Achieving Effective Resolution in Divorce without Litigation (American Bar Association).

Tesler, Pauline and Thompson, Peggy. 2006. Collaborative Divorce: The Revolutionary New Way to Restructure Your Family, Resolve Legal Issues, and Move On with Your Life (Harper Collins).

Caraccilo, Dominic J. (2011). Beyond Guns and Steel: A War Termination Strategy. Santa Barbara, California: PSI.  978-0-313-39149-1.

ISBN

(2011). The Five Percent: Finding Solutions to Seemingly Impossible Conflicts. PublicAffairs. ISBN 978-1-58648-921-2.

Coleman, Peter T.

Kellett, Peter M. (2007). Conflict Dialogue. London: Sage Publications.  978-1-4129-0930-3.

ISBN