Katana VentraIP

Forgiveness

Forgiveness, in a psychological sense, is the intentional and voluntary process by which one who may have felt initially wronged, victimized, harmed or hurt goes through a process in changing feelings and attitude regarding a given offender for his/her actions, and overcomes the impact of the offense, flaw or mistake including negative emotions such as resentment or a desire for vengeance.[1] Theorists differ in the extent to which they believe forgiveness also implies replacing the negative emotions with positive attitudes (i.e. an increased ability to tolerate the offender),[2][3][4] or requires reconciliation with the offender.[5] In certain legal contexts, forgiveness is a term for absolving someone of debt, loan, obligation, or other claims.[6] Such legal usage can also be thought of as mercy, being distinct from forgiveness.[7]

For other uses, see Forgiveness (disambiguation).

On the psychological level, forgiveness is different from simple condoning (viewing an action as harmful, yet to be “forgiven” or overlooked for certain reasons of “charity”), excusing or pardoning (merely releasing the offender from responsibility for an action), or forgetting (attempting to remove from one's consciousness the memory of an offense). In some schools of thought, it involves a personal and "voluntary" effort at the self-transformation of one's own half of a relationship with another, such that one is restored to peace and ideally to what psychologist Carl Rogers has referred to as “unconditional positive regard” towards the other.[2][8] Forgiveness can seal off a past wrongdoing and remove it from the present.[9]


As a psychological concept and as a virtue, the obligation to forgive and the benefits of forgiveness have been explored in religious thought, moral philosophy, social sciences, and medicine. Forgiveness may be considered simply in terms of the person who forgives,[10] which may include forgiving themselves. This can be in terms of the person forgiven or in terms of the relationship between the forgiver and the person forgiven. In most contexts, forgiveness is granted without any expectation of restorative justice, and without any response on the part of the offender (for example, one may forgive a person who is incommunicado or dead). In practical terms, it may be necessary for the offender to offer some form of acknowledgment, such as an apology, or to explicitly ask for forgiveness, in order for the wronged person to believe themselves able to forgive.[2]


Social and political dimensions of forgiveness involve the strictly private and religious sphere of "forgiveness". The notion of "forgiveness" is generally considered unusual in the political field. However, Hannah Arendt considers that the "faculty of forgiveness" has its place in public affairs. She believes that forgiveness can liberate resources both individually and collectively in the face of the irreparable, by freeing people to act in ways that are not merely reactive to the original wrong: "Forgiving is the only reaction which does not merely re-act but acts anew and unexpectedly, unconditioned by the act which provoked it and therefore freeing from its consequences both the one who forgives and the one who is forgiven."[11]


In a study conducted in Rwanda to examine the discourses and practices of forgiveness following the 1994 genocide, sociologist Benoit Guillou highlighted the extensive range of meanings associated with the term "forgiveness" and its underlying political nature. In the study's findings, the author presented four primary aspects of forgiveness to facilitate a clearer comprehension of both its multifaceted applications and the circumstances in which forgiveness can contribute to the restoration of social connections.[12]


Most world religions include teachings on forgiveness, and many of these provide a foundation for various modern traditions and practices of forgiveness. Some religious doctrines or philosophies emphasize the need for people to find divine forgiveness for their shortcomings; others place greater emphasis on the need for people to forgive one another; yet others make little or no distinction between human and divine forgiveness.


Forgiveness is interpreted in many ways by different people and cultures. This is important in relationship-oriented communication. When all parties share a mutual view of forgiveness then a relationship can be maintained. "Understanding antecedents of forgiveness, exploring the physiology of forgiveness, and training people to become more forgiving all imply that we have a shared meaning for the term".[13]

Forgiveness is not condoning[20]

[2]

Forgiveness is not forgetting[20]

[2]

Forgiveness is not excusing (i.e. making reasons to explain away offender's responsibility or free will)[20]

[2]

Forgiveness does not have to be religious or otherworldly

[20]

Forgiveness is not minimizing your hurt

[20]

Forgiveness is not reconciliation (i.e. reestablishing trust in the relationship)[20][21]

[2]

Forgiveness is not denying or suppressing anger; rather its focus is on resentment.[23][20] In particular, in order to forgive it is healthy to acknowledge and express negative emotions, before you can forgive[24]

[22]

Forgiveness is not ignoring accountability or justice. In particular, punishment and compensation are independent of the choice to forgive (you can forgive, or not forgive, and still pursue punishment and/or compensation, regardless)[26][27]

[25]

Forgiveness is not pardoning; it cannot be granted or chosen by someone else[20]

[2]

Emotional forgiveness is not the same as decisional forgiveness or the expression of forgiveness. Expressing emotions (i.e., "I am angry at you" or "I forgive you") is not the same as genuinely having or experiencing the emotions (i.e., people can deny, mistake, or lie about their emotional experience to another person while genuinely feeling something else instead)[28]

[27]

Although this is heavily debated, emotional forgiveness is for you, not the offender[20] (i.e., unless you choose to make it so: by expressing it, or by trying to reconcile)

[4]

Forgiveness in philosophical thought[edit]

The philosopher Joseph Butler (Fifteen Sermons) defined forgiveness as "overcoming of resentment, the overcoming of moral hatred, as a speech act, and as forbearance".[31] In his 1962 lecture on "Freedom and Resentment"', philosopher P. F. Strawson described forgiveness as "a rather unfashionable subject in moral philosophy" at that time.[32]

Popular recognition[edit]

The need to forgive is widely recognized, but people are often at a loss for ways to accomplish it. For example, in a large representative sampling of American people on various religious topics in 1988, the Gallup Organization found that 94% said it was important to forgive, but 85% said they needed some outside help to be able to forgive. However, not even regular prayer was found to be effective.


Akin to forgiveness is mercy, so even if a person is not able to complete the forgiveness process they can still show mercy, especially when so many wrongs are done out of weakness rather than malice. The Gallup poll revealed that the only thing that was effective was "meditative prayer".[93]


Forgiveness as a tool has been extensively used in such areas as restorative justice programs,[94] after the abolition of apartheid in the truth and reconciliation process, among victims and perpetrators of Rwandan genocide, in response to the violence in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict and the Northern Ireland conflict. This has been documented in the film Beyond Right and Wrong: Stories of Justice and Forgiveness (2012).[95]


Forgiveness is associated with the theory of emotion because it draws from a person's emotional connection with the situation. Forgiveness is something that most people are taught to understand and practice at a young age.

Mental health[edit]

Survey data from 2000 showed that 61% of those participants who were part of a small religious group reported that the group helped them be more forgiving.[106] People who reported that their religious groups promoted forgiveness also related success in overcoming addictions, guilt, and perceiving encouragement when feeling discouraged.[106]


Mindfulness may play a role as a mediator in the relationship between forgiveness and health outcomes.[107] When combined with mindfulness, forgiveness has a beneficial impact on physical health. However, the effects of forgiveness on health are contingent upon the presence and practice of mindfulness.[107]


Self-forgiveness is an important part of self-acceptance and mental health in stages of life.[108] Failing to achieve self-forgiveness can have negative effects on mental health.[108] Among the elderly, self-forgiveness often involves introspection about past wrongdoings, aiming to prevent their recurrence; this process contributes to enhancing their authentic self-concept.[108] When people successfully learn from transgressions, they may experience improved mental health.[108]


Self-forgiveness can reduce feelings of guilt and shame associated with hypersexual behavior.[109] Hypersexual behaviour can cause distress and life problems.[109] Self-forgiveness may help individuals reduce hypersexual negative behaviours that cause problems.[109]


Self-forgiveness may be associated with procrastination; self-forgiveness allows a person to overcome the negative effects linked to an earlier behaviour and adopt proactive approaches toward similar tasks.[110] Embracing self-forgiveness in the context of procrastination can enhance self-esteem and mental well-being, potentially leading to a reduction in procrastination tendencies.[110]


The self-help book Forgiveness and Health: Scientific Evidence and Theories Relating Forgiveness to Better Health details the benefits and the mental, physical, and psychological results of forgiveness. Stress relief may be the chief factor that connects forgiveness and well-being. Levels of stress go down when levels of forgiveness rise, resulting in a decrease in mental health symptoms.[111]


Forgiveness lifts a burden, as the forgiver no longer feels anger or hatred toward the transgressor, and may better understand the transgressor. This improves their health and outlook.[112]


A meta-analysis of several controlled studies of forgiveness-oriented psychological interventions tried to determine whether certain classes of intervention helped people to forgive, and also whether this helped their emotional health in general.[113] It found strong support for forgiveness interventions that helped people go through a multi-step process of forgiveness, but no support for forgiveness interventions that were designed merely to help people decide to forgive.


Another meta-analysis examined how forgiveness interventions affected depression, anxiety, and hopelessness, and concluded that "interventions designed to promote forgiveness are more effective at helping participants achieve forgiveness and hope and reduce depression and anxiety than either no treatment or alternative treatments."[114]

 – 1976 book by Helen Schucman

A Course in Miracles

 – Heinous offenses in Buddhism

Anantarika-karma

 – Roman goddess of clemency

Clementia

 – Moved or motivated to help others

Compassion

 – Christian concept of repentance for sins

Contrition

 – Greek deity of mercy and compassion

Eleos

Ethics in religion

 – Ancient Hawaiian practice of reconciliation and forgiveness

Ho'oponopono

Letter of Reconciliation of the Polish Bishops to the German Bishops

 – Forgiveness of a crime by the government

Pardon

 – Negative conscious and emotional reaction to personal past acts and behaviours

Regret

 – Violation of an implicit or explicit relational rules

Relational transgressions

 – Distressing emotion experienced by a person who regrets actions they have done in the past

Remorse

 – Reviewing one's actions and feeling contrition or regret

Repentance

 – Emotion consisting of a mixture of disappointment, disgust and anger

Resentment

 – Commission tasked with discovering and revealing past wrongdoing

Truth and Reconciliation Commission

 – Concept of love without conditions

Unconditional love

Cecrle, Randall J. (2007). Balancing the Scales of Justice with Forgiveness and Repentance. DREC Enterprises.  978-1-60266-041-0.

ISBN

Forward, Susan (1990). Toxic Parents: Overcoming Their Hurtful Legacy and Reclaiming Your Life.

Griswold, Charles (2007). Forgiveness: a Philosophical Exploration. Cambridge University Press.  978-0-521-70351-2.

ISBN

Konstan, David (2010). Before Forgiveness: The Origins of a Moral Idea. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kramer, Joel; Alstad, Diana (1993). The Guru Papers: Masks of Authoritarian Power. Frog Books.  1-883319-00-5.

ISBN

Lampert, Khen (2005). Traditions of Compassion: From Religious Duty to Social Activism. Palgrave Macmillan.  1-4039-8527-8.

ISBN

Lomax, Eric. The Railway Man: A POW's Searing Account of War, Brutality, and Forgiveness.

Luskin, Fred (2002). Forgive for Good: A Proven Prescription for Health and Happiness. Harper.

Marcus, G. (2011), The Power of Forgiveness, Sapients.Net

Murphy, J.; Hampton, J. (1988), Forgiveness and Mercy, Cambridge University Press

Norlock, K. (2009). Forgiveness from a Feminist Perspective. Lexington Books.

Pettigrove, G. (2012). Forgiveness and Love. Oxford University Press.

Safer, Jeanne (2000). Forgiving and Not Forgiving: Why Sometimes It's Better Not to Forgive. HarpPeren.  0-380-79471-3.

ISBN

Schmidt, Doug (2003). The Prayer of Revenge: Forgiveness in the Face of Injustice. David C Cook.  0-7814-3942-6.

ISBN

Tipping, Colin C. (1997). Radical Forgiveness: Making Room for the Miracle. Quest Publishing & Distribution.  0-9704814-1-1.

ISBN

Hughes, Paul; Warmke, Brandon. . In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

"Forgiveness"

at Curlie

Forgiveness