Katana VentraIP

Historical method

Historical method is the collection of techniques and guidelines that historians use to research and write histories of the past. Secondary sources, primary sources and material evidence such as that derived from archaeology may all be drawn on, and the historian's skill lies in identifying these sources, evaluating their relative authority, and combining their testimony appropriately in order to construct an accurate and reliable picture of past events and environments.

"Scientific history" redirects here. For the study of the development of science, see History of science.

In the philosophy of history, the question of the nature, and the possibility, of a sound historical method is raised within the sub-field of epistemology. The study of historical method and of different ways of writing history is known as historiography.


Though historians agree in very general and basic principles, in practice "specific canons of historical proof are neither widely observed nor generally agreed upon" among professional historians.[1] Some scholars of history have observed that there are no particular standards for historical fields such as religion, art, science, democracy, and social justice as these are by their nature 'essentially contested' fields, such that they require diverse tools particular to each field beforehand in order to interpret topics from those fields.[2]

Human sources may be such as a fingerprint; or narratives such as a statement or a letter. Relics are more credible sources than narratives.

relics

Any given source may be forged or corrupted. Strong indications of the originality of the source increase its reliability.

The closer a source is to the event which it purports to describe, the more one can trust it to give an accurate historical description of what actually happened.

An is more reliable than testimony at second hand, which is more reliable than hearsay at further remove, and so on.

eyewitness

If a number of independent sources contain the same message, the credibility of the message is strongly increased.

The tendency of a source is its motivation for providing some kind of . Tendencies should be minimized or supplemented with opposite motivations.

bias

If it can be demonstrated that the witness or source has no direct interest in creating bias then the credibility of the message is increased.

Antiquarian

Archaeology

Archival research

Auxiliary sciences of history

Chinese whispers

Historical criticism

Historical significance

Historiography

List of history journals

Philosophy of history

Recorded history

Scholarly method

Scientific method

Source criticism

Unwitting testimony

Gilbert J. Garraghan, A Guide to Historical Method, Fordham University Press: New York (1946).  0-8371-7132-6

ISBN

Understanding History: A Primer of Historical Method, Alfred A. Knopf: New York (1950). ISBN 0-394-30215-X.

Louis Gottschalk

and Walter Prevenier, From Reliable Sources: An Introduction to Historical Methods, Cornell University Press: Ithaca (2001). ISBN 0-8014-8560-6.

Martha Howell

C. Behan McCullagh, Justifying Historical Descriptions, Cambridge University Press: New York (1984).  0-521-31830-0.

ISBN

Presnell, J. L. (2019). The information-literate historian: a guide to research for history students (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

R. J. Shafer, A Guide to Historical Method, The Dorsey Press: Illinois (1974).  0-534-10825-3.

ISBN

by Marc Comtois

Introduction to Historical Method

Archived 2005-09-05 at the Wayback Machine by Paul Newall

Philosophy of History

in United States law

Federal Rules of Evidence