History of the concept[edit]

The University of Paris in 1231 consisted of four faculties: Theology, Medicine, Canon Law and Arts.[3] Educational institutions originally used the term "discipline" to catalog and archive the new and expanding body of information produced by the scholarly community. Disciplinary designations originated in German universities during the beginning of the nineteenth century.


Most academic disciplines have their roots in the mid-to-late-nineteenth century secularization of universities, when the traditional curricula were supplemented with non-classical languages and literatures, social sciences such as political science, economics, sociology and public administration, and natural science and technology disciplines such as physics, chemistry, biology, and engineering.


In the early twentieth century, new academic disciplines such as education and psychology were added. In the 1970s and 1980s, there was an explosion of new academic disciplines focusing on specific themes, such as media studies, women's studies, and Africana studies. Many academic disciplines designed as preparation for careers and professions, such as nursing, hospitality management, and corrections, also emerged in the universities. Finally, interdisciplinary scientific fields of study such as biochemistry and geophysics gained prominence as their contribution to knowledge became widely recognized. Some new disciplines, such as public administration, can be found in more than one disciplinary setting; some public administration programs are associated with business schools (thus emphasizing the public management aspect), while others are linked to the political science field (emphasizing the policy analysis aspect).


As the twentieth century approached, these designations were gradually adopted by other countries and became the accepted conventional subjects. However, these designations differed between various countries.[4] In the twentieth century, the natural science disciplines included: physics, chemistry, biology, geology, and astronomy. The social science disciplines included: economics, politics, sociology, and psychology.


Prior to the twentieth century, categories were broad and general, which was expected due to the lack of interest in science at the time. With rare exceptions, practitioners of science tended to be amateurs and were referred to as "natural historians" and "natural philosophers"—labels that date back to Aristotle—instead of "scientists".[5] Natural history referred to what we now call life sciences and natural philosophy referred to the current physical sciences.


Prior to the twentieth century, few opportunities existed for science as an occupation outside the educational system. Higher education provided the institutional structure for scientific investigation, as well as economic support for research and teaching. Soon, the volume of scientific information rapidly increased and researchers realized the importance of concentrating on smaller, narrower fields of scientific activity. Because of this narrowing, scientific specializations emerged. As these specializations developed, modern scientific disciplines in universities also improved their sophistication. Eventually, academia's identified disciplines became the foundations for scholars of specific specialized interests and expertise.[6]

Functions and criticism[edit]

An influential critique of the concept of academic disciplines came from Michel Foucault in his 1975 book, Discipline and Punish. Foucault asserts that academic disciplines originate from the same social movements and mechanisms of control that established the modern prison and penal system in eighteenth-century France, and that this fact reveals essential aspects they continue to have in common: "The disciplines characterize, classify, specialize; they distribute along a scale, around a norm, hierarchize individuals in relation to one another and, if necessary, disqualify and invalidate." (Foucault, 1975/1979, p. 223)[7]

Communities of academic disciplines[edit]

Communities of academic disciplines can be found outside academia within corporations, government agencies, and independent organizations, where they take the form of associations of professionals with common interests and specific knowledge. Such communities include corporate think tanks, NASA, and IUPAC. Communities such as these exist to benefit the organizations affiliated with them by providing specialized new ideas, research, and findings.


Nations at various developmental stages will find the need for different academic disciplines during different times of growth. A newly developing nation will likely prioritize government, political matters and engineering over those of the humanities, arts and social sciences. On the other hand, a well-developed nation may be capable of investing more in the arts and social sciences. Communities of academic disciplines would contribute at varying levels of importance during different stages of development.

Bibliometric studies of disciplines[edit]

Bibliometrics can be used to map several issues in relation to disciplines, for example, the flow of ideas within and among disciplines (Lindholm-Romantschuk, 1998)[9] or the existence of specific national traditions within disciplines.[10] Scholarly impact and influence of one discipline on another may be understood by analyzing the flow of citations.[11]


The Bibliometrics approach is described as straightforward because it is based on simple counting. The method is also objective but the quantitative method may not be compatible with a qualitative assessment and therefore manipulated. The number of citations is dependent on the number of persons working in the same domain instead of inherent quality or published result's originality.[12]

Art school

Outline of academic disciplines

List of academic fields

Abbott, A. (1988). The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor, University of Chicago Press.  978-0-226-00069-5

ISBN

Augsburg, T. (2005), Becoming Interdisciplinary: An Introduction to Interdisciplinary Studies.

Dogan, M. & Pahre, R. (1990). "The fate of formal disciplines: from coherence to dispersion". In Creative Marginality: Innovation at the Intersections of Social Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview. pp. 85–113.

Dullemeijer, P. (1980). "" Journal Acta Biotheoretica, 29(2), 87–93.

Dividing biology into disciplines: Chaos or multiformity?

Fagin, R.; Halpern, J.Y.; Moses, Y. & Vardi, M.Y. (1995). Reasoning about Knowledge, MIT Press.  0-262-56200-6

ISBN

Gibbons, M.; Limoges, C.; Nowotny, H.; Schwartzman, S.; Scott, P. & Trow, M. (1994). . London: Sage.

The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies

Golinski, J. (1998/2005). Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivis, and the History of Science. New York: Cambridge University Press. Chapter 2: "Identity and discipline". Part II: The Disciplinary Mold. pp. 66–78.

Hicks, D. (2004). "". IN: Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Ed. Henk Moed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

The Four Literatures of Social Science

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. New edition. University of Michigan Press/ESL.

Klein, J.T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

Krishnan, Armin (January 2009), (PDF), NCRM Working Paper Series, Southampton: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, retrieved September 10, 2017

What are Academic Disciplines? Some observations on the Disciplinarity vs. Interdisciplinarity debate

Leydesdorff, L. & Rafols, I. (2008). . Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.

A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories

Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y. (1998). . Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.

Scholarly Book Reviewing in the Social Sciences and Humanities: The Flow of Ideas within and among Disciplines

Martin, B. (1998). . London: Freedom Press

Information Liberation: Challenging the Corruptions of Information Power

Morillo, F.; Bordons, M. & Gomez, I. (2001). "". Scientometrics, 51(1), 203–22.

An approach to interdisciplinarity bibliometric indicators

Morillo, F.; Bordons, M. & Gomez, I. (2003). "Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1237–49.

Newell, A. (1983). "Reflections on the structure of an interdiscipline". In Machlup, F. & U. Mansfield (Eds.), The Study of Information: Interdisciplinary Messages. pp. 99–110. NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Pierce, S.J. (1991). "Subject areas, disciplines and the concept of authority". Library and Information Science Research, 13, 21–35.

Porter, A.L.; Roessner, J.D.; Cohen, A.S. & Perreault, M. (2006). "". Research Evaluation, 15(3), 187–95.

Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture

Prior, P. (1998). . Lawrence Erlbaum. (Rhetoric, Knowledge and Society Series)

Writing/Disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy

Qin, J.; Lancaster, F.W. & Allen, B. (1997). "". Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10), 893–916.

Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences

Rinia, E.J.; van Leeuwen, T.N.; Bruins, E.E.W.; van Vuren, H.G. & van Raan, A.F.J. (2002). "". Scientometrics, 54(3), 347–62.

Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science

Sanz-Menendez, L.; Bordons, M. & Zulueta, M. A. (2001). "". Research Evaluation, 10(1), 47–58.

Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: its measure in three different research areas

Stichweh, R. (2001). "Scientific Disciplines, History of". Smelser, N.J. & Baltes, P.B. (eds.). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier Science. pp. 13727–31.

Szostak, R. (October 2000). Superdisciplinarity: A Simple Definition of Interdisciplinarity With Profound Implications. Association for Integrative Studies, Portland, Oregon. (Meeting presentation)

Tengström, E. (1993). Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskapen – ett fler- eller tvärvetenskapligt område? Svensk Biblioteksforskning (1), 9–20.

Tomov, D.T. & Mutafov, H.G. (1996). "Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science". Scientometrics, 37(2), 267–78.

van Leeuwen, T.N. & Tijssen, R.J.W. (1993). "Assessing multidisciplinary areas of science and technology – A synthetic bibliometric study of Dutch nuclear-energy research". Scientometrics, 26(1), 115–33.

van Leeuwen, T.N. & Tijssen, R.J.W. (2000). "Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows". Research Evaluation, 9(3), 183–87.

Weisgerber, D.W. (1993). "Interdisciplinary searching – problems and suggested remedies – A Report from the ICSTI Group on Interdisciplinary Searching". Journal of Documentation, 49(3), 231–54.

Wittrock, B. (2001). "Disciplines, History of, in the Social Sciences". International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, pp. 3721–28. Smeltser, N.J. & Baltes, P.B. (eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Association for Interdisciplinary Studies

Sandoz, R. (ed.), Interactive Historical Atlas of the Disciplines, University of Geneva

at the Collin's Dictionary

Academic discipline