Katana VentraIP

Gerrymandering

In representative electoral systems, gerrymandering (/ˈɛriˌmændərɪŋ/, originally /ˈɡɛriˌmændərɪŋ/)[1][2] is the political manipulation of electoral district boundaries with the intent to create undue advantage for a party, group, or socioeconomic class within the constituency. The manipulation may involve "cracking" (diluting the voting power of the opposing party's supporters across many districts) or "packing" (concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one district to reduce their voting power in other districts).[3] Gerrymandering can also be used to protect incumbents. Wayne Dawkins, a professor at Morgan State University, describes it as politicians picking their voters instead of voters picking their politicians.[4]

For the film, see Gerrymandering (film). "Gerrymander" redirects here. For the arachnids, see Jerrymander (arachnid). For the plants, see Germander.

The term gerrymandering is a portmanteau of a salamander and Elbridge Gerry,[a][5] Vice President of the United States at the time of his death, who, as governor of Massachusetts in 1812, signed a bill that created a partisan district in the Boston area that was compared to the shape of a mythological salamander. The term has negative connotations, and gerrymandering is almost always considered a corruption of the democratic process. The resulting district is known as a gerrymander (/ˈɛriˌmændər, ˈɡɛri-/). The word is also a verb for the process.[6][7]

"Cracking" involves spreading voters of a particular type among many districts in order to deny them a sufficiently large in any particular district.[21] Political parties in charge of redrawing district lines may create more "cracked" districts as a means of retaining, and possibly even expanding, their legislative power. By "cracking" districts, a political party can maintain, or gain, legislative control by ensuring that the opposing party's voters are not the majority in specific districts.[22][23] For example, the voters in an urban area can be split among several districts in each of which the majority of voters are suburban, on the presumption that the two groups would vote differently, and the suburban voters would be far more likely to get their way in the elections.

voting bloc

"Packing" is concentrating many voters of one type into a single electoral district to reduce their influence in other districts.[23] In some cases, this may be done to obtain representation for a community of common interest (such as to create a majority-minority district), rather than to dilute that interest over several districts to a point of ineffectiveness (and, when minority groups are involved, to avoid lawsuits charging racial discrimination). When the party controlling the districting process has a statewide majority, packing is usually not necessary to attain partisan advantage; the minority party can generally be "cracked" everywhere. Packing is therefore more likely to be used for partisan advantage when the party controlling the districting process has a statewide minority, because by forfeiting a few districts packed with the opposition, cracking can be used in forming the remaining ones.

[21]

"Hijacking" redraws two districts in such a way as to force two incumbents to run against each other in one district, ensuring that one of them will be eliminated.

[21]

"Kidnapping" moves an incumbent's home address into another district. Reelection can become more difficult when the incumbent no longer resides in the district or faces reelection in a new district with a new voter base. This is often employed against politicians who represent multiple urban areas: larger cities are removed from the district to make it more rural.

[21]

Gerrymandering's primary goals are to maximize the effect of supporters' votes and minimize the effect of opponents' votes. A partisan gerrymander's main purpose is to influence not only the districting statute but the entire corpus of legislative decisions enacted in its path.[20]


These can be accomplished in a number of ways:[21]


These tactics are typically combined in some form, creating a few "forfeit" seats for packed voters of one type in order to secure more seats and greater representation for voters of another type. This results in candidates of one party (the one responsible for the gerrymandering) winning by small majorities in most of the districts, and another party winning by a large majority in only a few.[24] Any party that endeavors to make a district more favorable to voting for it based on the physical boundary is gerrymandering.

Difference from malapportionment[edit]

Gerrymandering should not be confused with malapportionment, whereby the number of eligible voters per elected representative can vary widely. Nevertheless, the -mander suffix has been applied to particular malapportionments. Sometimes political representatives use both gerrymandering and malapportionment to try to maintain power.[76][77] One of the earliest examples of malapportionment, rotten boroughs, was practiced in England from the 13th century until the 1832 reform act.[78] A striking modern example of malapportionment is the U.S. senate, where states receive equal representation despite widely varying populations.[79]

and Wales being favored in the Westminster Parliament with deliberately smaller electoral quotas (average electors per constituency) than those in England and Northern Ireland. This inequality was initiated by the House of Commons (Redistribution of Seats) Act 1958, which eliminated the previous common electoral quota for the whole United Kingdom and replaced it with four separate national quotas for the respective Boundaries commissions to work to: England 69,534; Northern Ireland 67,145; Wales 58,383; and Scotland 54,741.

Scotland

Current rules historically favoring geographically "natural" constituencies such as islands, which continue to give Wales and Scotland proportionally greater representation.

Population migrations, due to and deindustrialization tending to decrease the number of electors in inner-city districts.

white flight

Related terms[edit]

In a play on words, the use of race-conscious procedures in jury selection has been termed "jurymandering".[186][187]

Boundary problem (spatial analysis)

Electoral fraud

Gerrymandering in the United States

Gill v. Whitford

Modifiable areal unit problem

Schelling's model of segregation

Voter suppression

Wasted vote

La Raja, Raymond (11 May 2009). "". Annual Review of Political Science. 12 (1): 203–223.

Redistricting: Reading Between the Lines

McGhee, Eric (11 May 2020). "" (Archived 24 May 2020 at the Wayback Machine). Annual Review of Political Science. 23 (1): 171–185.

Partisan Gerrymandering and Political Science

Alleged Gerrymandering in Malaysia: Over-representation of rural districts

Archived 24 December 2009 at the Wayback Machine from International IDEA

A handbook of electoral system Design

Anti-Gerrymandering policy in Australia

Making Contact, produced by National Radio Project. 12 April 2011.

Redrawing Lines of Power: Redistricting 2011

All About Redistricting – Ideas for Reform

Honner, Patrick (1 January 2018). . WIRED.

"The Math Behind Gerrymandering and Wasted Votes"

, Core.ac.uk, Open access research papers Open access icon

"Gerrymandering"

– consortium of Boston-area researchers

Metric Geometry and Gerrymandering Group