Katana VentraIP

Political polarization

Political polarization (spelled polarisation in British English, African and Caribbean English, and New Zealand English) is the divergence of political attitudes away from the center, towards ideological extremes.[1][2][3] Scholars distinguish between ideological polarization (differences between the policy positions) and affective polarization (an emotional dislike and distrust of political out-groups).[4]

For the social psychology concept, see Group polarization.

Most discussions of polarization in political science consider polarization in the context of political parties and democratic systems of government. In two-party systems, political polarization usually embodies the tension of its binary political ideologies and partisan identities.[1][2][3][5][6][7] However, some political scientists assert that contemporary polarization depends less on policy differences on a left and right scale but increasingly on other divisions such as religious against secular, nationalist against globalist, traditional against modern, or rural against urban.[8] Polarization is associated with the process of politicization.[9]

Civil war

Contentious politics

Cook Partisan Voting Index

in contrast

Cultural pluralism

Democratic backsliding

False dilemma

Hate speech

Ideocracy

Income inequality in the United States § Political polarization

Left–right politics

Moral foundations theory

Multi-party system

Partisan (political)

Social polarization

State collapse

Abramowitz, Alan (1994). "Issue Evolution Reconsidered: Racial Attitudes and Partisanship in the U.S. Electorate". The Sociological Quarterly. 38 (1): 1–24. :10.2307/2111333. JSTOR 2111333.

doi

Clark, Cal; Tan, Alexander C. (2012). (PDF). Journal of Current Chinese Affairs. 41 (3): 7–31. doi:10.1177/186810261204100302. S2CID 73640516.

"Political Polarization in Taiwan: A Growing Challenge to Catch-all Parties?"

Frymer, Paul. . The Brennan Center Jorde Symposium on Constitutional Law. 2011: 335–350.

"Debating the Causes of Party Polarization in America"

Hahm, Hyeonho, David Hilpert and Thomas König (2023) "Divided We Unite: The Nature of Partyism and the Role of Coalition Partnership in Europe". American Political Science Review,

DOI: 10.1017/S0003055423000266

Hahm, Hyeonho, David Hilpert and Thomas König (2022) "Divided by Europe: Affective Polarisation in the Context of European Elections". West European Politics,

DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2022.2133277

Kallis, Aristotle A. London, England; New York: Routledge, 2000.

Fascist ideology: territory and expansionism in Italy and Germany, 1922–1945.

Keefer, Philip; Knack, Stephen (2002). "Polarization, Politics and Property Rights: Links between Inequality and Growth". Public Choice. 111 (1/2): 127–154. :10.1023/A:1015168000336. JSTOR 30026274. S2CID 9467286.

doi

Leege, David C., Kenneth D. Wald, Brian S. Krueger, and Paul D. Mueller. N.p.: University of Florida, 2001.

The Politics of Cultural Differences: Social Change and Voter Mobilization Strategies in the Post-New Deal Period.

McCarty, Nolan M. . The Brennan Center Jorde Symposium on Constitutional Law. 359: 359–372.

"Limits of Electoral and Legislative Reform in Addressing Polarization"

Nivola, Peter. The Brookings Institution, January 2005.

"Thinking About Political Polarization."

Pierson, Paul and Eric Schickler. 2020. "" Annual Review of Political Science 23:1, 37-58

Madison's Constitution Under Stress: A Developmental Analysis of Political Polarization.

Simon, Sheldon W. (1979). "China, Vietnam, and ASEAN: The Politics of Polarization". Asian Survey. 19 (12): 1171–1188. :10.2307/2643963. JSTOR 2643963.

doi

Pew Research Center, , June 12, 2014, people-press.org.

Political Polarization in the American Public

Stewart, Alexander J.; McCarty, Nolan; Bryson, Joanna J. (2020). . Science Advances. 6 (50): eabd4201. arXiv:1807.11477. Bibcode:2020SciA....6.4201S. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd4201. PMC 7732181. PMID 33310855. S2CID 216144890.

"Polarization under rising inequality and economic decline"

Sunstein, Cass R (2001). . Yale Law Journal. 110 (71): 71–120. doi:10.2307/797587. JSTOR 797587.

"Deliberative Trouble – Why Groups Go to Extremes"