Katana VentraIP

Political violence

Political violence is violence which is perpetrated in order to achieve political goals.[2] It can include violence which is used by a state against other states (war), violence which is used by a state against civilians and non-state actors (forced disappearance, psychological warfare, police brutality, targeted assassinations, torture, ethnic cleansing, or genocide), and violence which is used by violent non-state actors against states and civilians (kidnappings, targeted assassinations, terrorist attacks, torture, psychological and/or guerrilla warfare).[3][4] It can also describe politically motivated violence which is used by violent non-state actors against a state (rebellion, rioting, treason, or coup d'etat) or it can describe violence which is used against other non-state actors and/or civilians.[2][3][4] Non-action on the part of a government can also be characterized as a form of political violence, such as refusing to alleviate famine or otherwise denying resources to politically identifiable groups within their territory.

Due to the imbalances of power which exist between state and non-state actors, political violence often takes the form of asymmetric warfare where neither side is able to directly assault the other, instead relying on tactics such as guerrilla warfare and terrorism.[2][3][4] It can often include attacks on civilian or otherwise non-combatant targets.[5] People may be collectively targeted based on the perception that they are part of a social, ethnic, religious, or political group;[5] or selectively, targeting specific individuals for actions that are perceived as challenging someone or aiding an opponent.[5][6]


Many politically motivated militant, insurgent, extremist, and/or fundamentalist groups and individuals[7] are convinced that the states and political systems under which they live will never respond to their demands, and they thus believe that the only way to overthrow and/or reshape the government or state accordingly to their political and/or religious worldview is through violent means, which they regard as not only justified but also necessary in order to achieve their political and/or religious objectives.[5][8][9][10] Similarly, many governments around the world believe that they need to use violence in order to intimidate their populaces into acquiescence. At other times, governments use force in order to defend their countries from outside invasions or other threats of force and coerce other governments or conquer territory.[11][12]

explain how political, economic, and social processes cause political violence

Macro theories

discuss political violence processes that involve individuals and households, like who participates in violence and what motivates people to participate[58]

Micro theories

State-based armed conflict is cataloged as international conflicts and civil wars—in which at least one of the warring parties is the government of a state.

Interstate Conflicts are conflicts between two states.

Intrastate Conflicts happen within a state such as a civil war.

Non-state armed conflicts are conflicts which consist of fighting between two armed groups, neither of which is the government of a state

One-sided violence is thought of as targeted attacks against unarmed civilians.

[14]

Political Violence: Belief, Behavior, and Legitimation, Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.

Paul Hollander

Philip Herbst, Talking terrorism: a dictionary of the loaded language of political violence, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2003.

Media related to Political violence at Wikimedia Commons

by Marsh McLennan

Political Risk Report