Katana VentraIP

Tito–Stalin split

The Tito–Stalin split[a] or the Soviet–Yugoslav split[b] was the culmination of a conflict between the political leaderships of Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union, under Josip Broz Tito and Joseph Stalin, respectively, in the years following World War II. Although presented by both sides as an ideological dispute, the conflict was as much the product of a geopolitical struggle in the Balkans that also involved Albania, Bulgaria, and the communist insurgency in Greece, which Tito's Yugoslavia supported and the Soviet Union secretly opposed.

In the years following World War II, Yugoslavia pursued economic, internal, and foreign policy objectives that did not align with the interests of the Soviet Union and its Eastern Bloc allies. In particular, Yugoslavia hoped to admit neighbouring Albania to the Yugoslav federation. This fostered an atmosphere of insecurity within the Albanian political leadership and exacerbated tensions with the Soviet Union, which made efforts to impede Albanian–Yugoslav integration. Yugoslav support of the communist rebels in Greece against the wishes of the Soviet Union further complicated the political situation. Stalin tried to pressure Yugoslavia and moderate its policies using Bulgaria as an intermediary. When the conflict between Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union became public in 1948, it was portrayed as an ideological dispute to avoid the impression of a power struggle within the Eastern Bloc.


The split ushered in the Informbiro period of purges within the Communist Party of Yugoslavia. It was accompanied by a significant level of disruption to the Yugoslav economy, which had previously depended on the Eastern Bloc. The conflict also prompted fears of an impending Soviet invasion and even a coup attempt by senior Soviet-aligned military leaders, a fear fueled by thousands of border incidents and incursions orchestrated by the Soviets and their allies. Deprived of aid from the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc, Yugoslavia subsequently turned to the United States for economic and military assistance.

Stalin's letters and open conflict[edit]

First letter[edit]

On 27 March, Stalin sent his first letter addressed to Tito and Kardelj, which formulated the conflict as an ideological one.[53] In his letter, Stalin denounced Tito and Kardelj, as well as Đilas, Svetozar Vukmanović, Boris Kidrič, and Aleksandar Ranković, as "dubious Marxists" responsible for the anti-Soviet atmosphere in Yugoslavia. Stalin also criticised Yugoslav policies on security, the economy, and political appointments. In particular, he resented the suggestion that Yugoslavia was more revolutionary than the Soviet Union, drawing comparisons to the positions and the fate of Leon Trotsky. The purpose of the letter was to urge loyal Communists to remove the "dubious Marxists".[54] The Soviets maintained contact with Žujović and the former minister of industry Andrija Hebrang and, in early 1948, instructed Žujović to oust Tito from office. They hoped to secure the position of the general secretary of the KPJ for Žujović and have Hebrang fill the post of the prime minister.[55]


Tito convened the KPJ Central Committee on 12 April to draw up a letter in response to Stalin. Tito repudiated Stalin's claims and referred to them as slander and misinformation. He also emphasised the KPJ's achievements of national independence and equality. Žujović was the only one to oppose Tito at the meeting. He advocated making Yugoslavia a part of the Soviet Union, and questioned what the country's future position in international relations would be if the alliance between the two countries was not maintained.[56] Tito called for action against Žujović and Hebrang. He denounced Hebrang, claiming that his actions were the primary reason for Soviet mistrust. To discredit him, charges were fabricated alleging that Hebrang had become a spy for the Croatian ultra-nationalist and fascist Ustaše movement during his captivity in 1942, and that he was subsequently blackmailed with that information by the Soviets. Both Žujović and Hebrang were apprehended within a week.[57]

Second letter[edit]

On 4 May, Stalin sent the second letter to the KPJ. He denied the Soviet leadership was misinformed about the situation in Yugoslavia and claimed that the differences were over a matter of principle. He also denied Hebrang was a Soviet source in the KPJ but confirmed that Žujović was indeed one. Stalin questioned the scale of KPJ's achievements, alleging that the success of any communist party depended on Red Army assistance—implying the Soviet military was essential to whether or not the KPJ retained power. Finally, he suggested taking the matter up before the Cominform.[58] In their response to the second letter, Tito and Kardelj rejected arbitration by the Cominform and accused Stalin of lobbying other communist parties to affect the outcome of the dispute.[59]

Third letter and Cominform Resolution[edit]

On 19 May, Tito received an invitation for the Yugoslav delegation to attend a Cominform meeting to discuss the situation concerning the KPJ. However, the KPJ Central Committee rejected the invitation the next day. Stalin then sent his third letter, now addressed to Tito and Hebrang, stating that failure to speak on behalf of the KPJ before the Cominform would amount to a tacit admission of guilt. On 19 June, the KPJ received a formal invitation to attend the Cominform meeting in Bucharest two days later. The KPJ leadership informed the Cominform that they would not send any delegates.[60]


The Cominform published its Resolution on the KPJ on 28 June exposing the conflict and criticising the KPJ for anti-Sovietism and ideological errors, lack of democracy in the party, and an inability to accept criticism.[61] Moreover, the Cominform accused the KPJ of opposing the parties within the organisation, splitting from the united socialist front, betraying international solidarity of the working people, and assuming a nationalist posture. Finally, the KPJ was declared outside the Cominform. The resolution claimed there were "healthy" members of the KPJ whose loyalty would be measured by their readiness to overthrow Tito and his leadership—expecting this to be achieved solely because of Stalin's charisma. Stalin expected the KPJ to back down, sacrifice the "dubious Marxists", and realign itself with him.[61]

De-satellization of the Socialist Republic of Romania

De-Stalinization

Sino-Soviet split

Albanian–Soviet split

Auty, Phyllis (1969). "Yugoslavia's International Relations (1945–1965)". In (ed.). Contemporary Yugoslavia: Twenty Years of Socialist Experiment. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. pp. 154–202. ISBN 978-0-520-33110-5.

Vucinich, Wayne S.

Banac, Ivo (2008). "Introduction". In Banac, Ivo (ed.). . New Hven: Yale University Press. pp. xv–xlviii. ISBN 978-0-300-13385-1.

The Diary of Georgi Dimitrov, 1933–1949

Eglin, Darrel R. (1982). "The Economy". In Nyrop, Richard F. (ed.). . Area handbook series (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. pp. 113–168. LCCN 82011632.

Yugoslavia, a Country Study

Jennings, Christian (2017). . London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-5126-0172-5.

Flashpoint Trieste: The First Battle of the Cold War

(2005). Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945. New York, New York: Penguin Press. ISBN 1-59420-065-3.

Judt, Tony

Kane, Robert B. (2014). "Corfu Channel Incident, 1946". In Hall, Richard C. (ed.). (2nd ed.). Santa Barbara, California: ABC-Clio. pp. 76–77. ISBN 978-1-61069-030-0.

War in the Balkans

Klemenčić, Mladen; Schofield, Clive H. (2001). . Durham, UK: International Boundaries Research Unit. ISBN 978-1-897643-41-9.

War and Peace on the Danube: The Evolution of the Croatia-Serbia Boundary

Laković, Ivan; Tasić, Dmitar (2016). . Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books. ISBN 978-1-4985-3934-0.

The Tito–Stalin Split and Yugoslavia's Military Opening toward the West, 1950–1954: In NATO's Backyard

Lulushi, Albert (2014). . New York City, New York: Skyhorse Publishing. ISBN 978-1-62872-394-6.

Operation Valuable Fiend: The CIA's First Paramilitary Strike Against the Iron Curtain

McClellan, Woodford (1969). "Postwar Political Evolution". In Vucinich, Wayne S. (ed.). . Berkeley, California: University of California Press. pp. 119–153. ISBN 978-0-520-33110-5.

Contemporary Yugoslavia: Twenty Years of Socialist Experiment

Theotokis, Nikolaos (2020). . Barnsley, UK: Pen and Sword Military. ISBN 978-1-5267-4702-0.

Airborne Landing to Air Assault: A History of Military Parachuting

Woodward, Susan L. (1995). . Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-08645-1.

Socialist Unemployment: The Political Economy of Yugoslavia, 1945–1990

Banac, Ivo (1995). "The Tito–Stalin Split and the Greek Civil War". In Iatrides, John O.; Wrigley, Linda (eds.). . University Park, Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press. ISBN 978-0-271-02568-1.

Greece at the Crossroads: The Civil War and Its Legacy

(2011). "Yugoslav-Soviet Relations: The View of the Western Diplomats (1944–1946)". The Balkans in the Cold War: Balkan Federations, Cominform, Yugoslav-Soviet Conflict. Belgrade, Serbia: Institute for Balkan Studies. pp. 109–140. ISBN 978-86-7179-073-4.

Dimić, Ljubodrag

Karchmar, Lucien (1982). "The Tito-Stalin Split in Soviet and Yugoslav Historiography". In (ed.). At the Brink of War and Peace: The Tito-Stalin Split in a Historic Perspective. New York, New York: Brooklyn College Press. pp. 253–271. ISBN 978-0-914710-98-1.

Vucinich, Wayne S.

Stokes, Gale, ed. (1996). "The Expulsion of Yugoslavia". (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-509446-6.

From Stalinism to Pluralism: A Documentary History of Eastern Europe Since 1945

(1994). "The Quarrel with Stalin". Tito: And the Rise and Fall of Yugoslavia. London, UK: Faber and Faber. ISBN 978-0-571-28110-7.

West, Richard