Katana VentraIP

2019–2020 COVID-19 outbreak in mainland China

The 2019–2020 COVID-19 outbreak in mainland China was the first COVID-19 outbreak in that country, and the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). China was the first country to experience an outbreak of the disease, the first to impose drastic measures in response (including lockdowns and face mask mandates), and one of the first countries to bring the outbreak under control.

COVID-19 pandemic in mainland China

Mainland China

1 December 2019
(4 years, 4 months, 3 weeks and 1 day ago)

The outbreak was first manifested as a cluster of mysterious pneumonia cases, mostly related to the Huanan Seafood Market, in Wuhan, the capital of Hubei province. On 8 January 2020, a new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as the cause of the pneumonia by Chinese scientists.[3]


During the beginning of the pandemic, the Chinese government showed a pattern of secrecy and top-down control.[4] It censored discussions about the outbreak since the beginning of its spread, from as early as 1 January,[5][6] worked to censor and counter reporting and criticism about the crisis – which included the detention of several citizen journalists[7] – and portray the official response to the outbreak in a positive light,[8][9][10] and restricted and facilitated investigations probing the origins of COVID-19.[4][11] Several commentators suspected the Chinese government had deliberately under-reported the extent of infections and deaths.[12][13][14] However, some academic studies have found no evidence that China manipulates COVID-19 data.[15][16][17]


The local governments of Wuhan and Hubei were widely criticized for their delayed responses to the virus and their censorship of the related information during the initial outbreak, especially during the local parliamentary sessions. This allowed early spread of the virus,[18] as a large number of Chinese people returned home for the Chinese New Year vacation from and through Wuhan, a major transportation hub.[19][20] However, stringent measures such as lockdown of Wuhan and the wider Hubei province and face mask mandates were introduced around 23 January,[21] which significantly lowered and delayed the epidemic peak according to epidemiology modelling.[22] Yet, by 29 January, the virus was found to have spread to all provinces of mainland China.[23][24][25] By the same date, all provinces had launched high-level public health emergency responses.[26] Many inter-province bus services[27] and railway services were suspended.[28] On 31 January, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.[25] A severe shortage of face masks and other protective gear[29] led several countries to send international aid, including medical supplies, to China.[30][31][32]


By late February, the pandemic had been brought under control in most Chinese provinces. On 25 February, the reported number of newly confirmed cases outside mainland China exceeded those reported from within for the first time; the WHO estimated that the measures taken in the country averted a significant number of cases.[33] By 6 March the reported number of new cases had dropped to fewer than 100 nationally per day, down from thousands per day at the height of the crisis. On 13 March, the reported number of newly imported cases passed that of domestically transmitted new cases for the first time.[34]


By the Summer of 2020, widespread community transmission in China had been ended, and restrictions were significantly eased.[35] Sporadic local outbreaks caused by imported cases have happened since then, which authorities responded to with testing and restrictions.[36] Different neighbourhoods or townships were classified into high-, medium- or low-risk based on the number of confirmed cases and whether there were cluster cases,[37] which formed the basis for the gradual easing of lockdown measures since March.[38] Lockdown in hard-hit Wuhan was officially lifted on 8 April.[39]


China is one of just a few of countries that have pursued a zero-COVID strategy, which aims to eliminate transmission of the virus within the country and allow resumption of normal economic and social activity.[40]


Despite concerns about automated social control, health codes generated by software have been used for contact tracing: only people with green code can move freely, while those with red or yellow code need to be reported to the government.[39][41] With domestic tourism first reopened among the pandemic-hit industries,[42][43] China's economy continued to broaden recovery from the recession during the pandemic, with stable job creation and record international trade growth, although retail consumption was still slower than predicted.[44][45] China was the only major economy to report economic growth in 2020.[46]


In July 2020, the government granted an emergency use authorization for two COVID-19 vaccines.[47][48] It has also pledged or provided humanitarian assistance to other countries dealing with the virus.[8][9]

Environment[edit]

The slowdown in manufacturing, construction, transportation and overall economic activity created a temporary reduction by about a quarter in China's greenhouse gas emissions.[177]

Further outbreaks in 2020[edit]

On 2 April 2020, the government ordered a Hubei-like lockdown in Jia County, Henan, after a woman tested positive for the COVID-19. It is suspected that she may have been infected when she visited a hospital where three doctors tested positive for the virus, despite showing no symptoms.[195]


On 9 April, a COVID-19 cluster was detected in Heilongjiang Province, which started with an asymptomatic patient returning from the United States and quarantining at home. The US CDC reported that the infections were initially spread through a shared elevator used at different times, and led to at least 71 cases by 22 April.[196]


In early May, restrictions were tightened in Harbin.[197]


In June, an outbreak with 45 people testing positive at Xinfadi Market in Beijing caused some alarm.[198] Authorities closed the market and nearby schools; eleven neighborhoods in the Fengtai District started requiring temperature checks and were closed to visitors.[199] By this time, public health technology included special leaf blower backpacks designed to vent hot air onto outdoor surfaces.[200] By the evening of 23 June, Chinese Vice Premier Sun Chunlan declared that the situation had been brought under control.[201] China's traffic authorities vowed to strictly guard traffic out of Beijing: those with abnormal health QR codes or without recently-taken negative PCR test proof would not be allowed to take public transportation or drive out of the capital.[202][203][204]


On 26 July, China saw its highest number of daily cases since March, mostly from outbreaks in Xinjiang and Liaoning.[205] with 61 new cases, up from 46 cases a day earlier,[206] This increased to 127 daily COVID cases on July 30.[207] The daily reported cases subsequently went down, to 16 on August 23.[208]


In July, Xinjiang province and its capital Ürümqi were locked down in the wake of the discovery of new cases in the city.[209][210]


On October 11, officials in Qingdao urged to carry out contact tracing and mass testing after 12 new cases were found connected to the Qingdao Chest Hospital. On October 12, it was announced that Qingdao would test all 9 million of its residents.[211]


In October, 137 asymptomatic cases were detected in Kashgar, Xinjiang and were linked to a garment factory.[212][213]


On December 18, a local case was reported in Beijing. It was the first local infection in 152 days in Beijing. As of 27 December, thirteen more cases have been detected.[214] Another outbreak linked to a traveler from South Korea was reported in Liaoning late December.[215]

International and regional relations[edit]

Information sharing[edit]

China's scientists have been praised for rapidly sharing information on the virus to the international community,[216][217] and leading some of the world's research on the disease.[218] Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said on 21 January that the Chinese authorities would share information of the epidemic "with the WHO, relevant nations and China's Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regions in a timely manner including the genome sequence of the new coronavirus."[219] During the sidelines of the World Economic Forum, Germany's health minister Jens Spahn praised China for its improved transparency since 2003.[220] US officials and WHO also praised China for sharing data about the epidemic and keeping transparent. The US experts had been invited by China's NHC.[221] On 23 January, the WHO director-general, Tedros Adhanom and the WHO regional director for the Western Pacific, Takeshi Kasai, arrived in Beijing to discuss the new coronavirus outbreak with the Chinese authorities and health experts.[222] China agreed on 28 January that the WHO would send international experts to China.[223]


John Mackenzie, a member of the World Health Organization's emergency committee criticized China for being too slow to share all of the infected cases, especially during major political meetings in Wuhan after Tedros Adhanom praised China for helping "prevent the spread of coronavirus to the other countries."[224] US President Donald Trump said that China was "very secretive and that's unfortunate" regarding the information on the pandemic.[225] Yanzhong Huang, a health expert at Seton Hall University, said that China could have been more forceful and "when there was a cover-up and there was inaction".[226]


A number of other countries' governments have called for an international examination of the virus's origin and spread.[227][228]


After an initial block, the Chinese government granted permission for a WHO team to visit China and investigate COVID-19's origins. In January 2021, Tedros Adhanom expressed his dismay as China blocked the team's entry.[229] The Chinese government had previously agreed to allow the team's entry.[230][231] A few days later, permission was granted for the team to arrive.[232][11][233] A WHO-affiliated health expert said expectations that the team would reach a conclusion from their trip should be "very low".[234]