Katana VentraIP

South Seas Mandate

The South Seas Mandate, officially the Mandate for the German Possessions in the Pacific Ocean Lying North of the Equator,[2] was a League of Nations mandate in the "South Seas" given to the Empire of Japan by the League of Nations following World War I. The mandate consisted of islands in the north Pacific Ocean that had been part of German New Guinea within the German colonial empire until they were occupied by Japan during World War I. Japan governed the islands under the mandate as part of the Japanese colonial empire until World War II, when the United States captured the islands. The islands then became the United Nations–established Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands governed by the United States. The islands are now part of Palau, the Northern Mariana Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Marshall Islands.[3]

Not to be confused with Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.

Japanese Mandate for the Governance of the South Seas Islands
  • 委任統治地域南洋群島 (Japanese)[1]
  • Nippon inin tōchi-ryō nan'yō guntō (rōmaji)

Mandate of the League of Nations (colony) under Japanese administration

 

28 June 1919

18 July 1947

In Japan, the territory is known as "Japanese Mandate for the Governance of the South Seas Islands" (委任統治地域南洋群島, Nippon Inin Tōchi-ryō Nan'yō Guntō)[4] and was governed by the Nan'yō Government (南洋廳, Nan'yō-chō).

Significance[edit]

The population of the South Seas Mandate was too small to provide significant markets and the indigenous people had very limited financial resources for the purchase of imported goods. The major significance of the territory to the Empire of Japan was its strategic location, which dominated sea lanes across the Pacific Ocean and provided convenient provisioning locations for sailing vessels in need of water, fresh fruit, vegetables and meat.


As a signatory of the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty, Japan agreed not to build new naval and air stations on the islands and it did not begin direct military preparations in the Mandate until the late 1930s.[25] Nevertheless, the territory provided important coaling stations for steam-powered vessels[26] and its possession gave an impetus to the Nanshin-ron doctrine of "southward advance".[25]

in the Marshall Islands was a major base supporting the attack on Pearl Harbor and the Battle of Wake Island.[40]

Kwajalein Atoll

Palau was used to support the .[46][40]

invasion of the Philippines by Japan

Saipan in the Mariana Islands supported the .[40]

Battle of Guam

Truk in the Caroline Islands became the base for amphibious landings on and Makin in the Gilberts during Japanese occupation of the Gilbert Islands,[40] as well as Rabaul in the Australian mandate Territory of New Guinea.

Tarawa

was used to relocate Ocean Island workers evacuated

Kosrae

in the Marshall Islands was used in air strikes against Howland Island.[40]

Majuro

Jaluit Atoll, also in the Marshall Islands, was the base from which the IJN seized and Ocean Island (now known as Banaba Island).[40]

Nauru

The terms of the mandate required Japan not to fortify the islands. However, these terms were ambiguous and poorly-defined, specifying only that Japan should not build "fortifications" or construct "military or naval bases". From 1921 the Japanese military began making surveys and plans so that rapid military deployment to the islands would be possible in case of war.[31]


During the 1930s, the IJN began construction of airfields, fortifications, ports, and other military projects in the islands controlled under the mandate,[20][40] viewing the islands as "unsinkable aircraft carriers" with a critical role to play in the defense of the Japanese home islands against potential US invasion. These became important staging grounds for Japanese air and naval offensives in the Pacific War.[40][45]


The Imperial Japanese Army also utilized the islands to support air and land detachments.


In order to capture the islands from Japan, the United States military employed a "leapfrogging" strategy which involved conducting amphibious assaults on selected Japanese island fortresses, subjecting some to air attack only and entirely skipping over others.[47] This strategy caused the Japanese Empire to lose control of its Pacific possessions between 1943 and 1945.[48]


The League of Nations mandate was formally revoked by the United Nations on 18 July 1947 pursuant to Security Council Resolution 21, making the United States responsible for administration of the islands under the terms of a United Nations trusteeship agreement which established the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.[49] Most of the islands subsequently became part of independent states.[25]

Boshirō Hosogaya

Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere

(Southern Expansion Doctrine)

Nanshin-ron

Structure of the Imperial Japanese forces in the South Seas Mandate

Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

Axelrod, Alan; Kingston, Jack A. (2007). . H W Fowler. ISBN 978-0816060221.

Encyclopedia of World War II, Volume 1

Beasley, W. G. (1991). Japanese Imperialism 1894–1945. London: Oxford University Press.  0198221681.

ISBN

Howe, Christopher (1999). The Origins of Japanese Trade Supremacy: Development and Technology in Asia from 1540 to the Pacific War. University Of Chicago Press.  0226354865.

ISBN

Myers, Ramon Hawley; (1984). The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895–1945. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691102221.

Peattie, Mark R.

Nish, Ian (1991). Japanese Foreign Policy in the Interwar Period. Praeger Publishers.  0275947912.

ISBN

Oliver, Douglas L. (1989). . University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 978-0824812331.

The Pacific Islands

Peattie, Mark R. "The Nan’yō: Japan in the South Pacific, 1885–1945". In .

Myers & Peattie (1984)

(1988). Nan'Yo: The Rise and Fall of the Japanese in Micronesia, 1885–1945. Pacific Islands Monograph Series. Vol. 4. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 0824814800.

Peattie, Mark

(1962). Sovereign and Subject. Ponsonby Memorial Society. pp. 346–353.

Ponsonby-Fane, Richard

US National Park Service (2004). . War in the Pacific: Administrative History. Evans-Hatch & Associates, Inc.

"Chapter 3: America on Guam – 1898–1950 (continued)"

Arnold, Bruce Makoto. "Conflicted Childhoods in the South Seas: The Failure of Racial Assimilation in the Nan'yo". The Tufts Historical Review Vol. 4, No. 11 (Spring 2011)

[1]

Childress, David Hatcher, The Lost City of Lemuria & The Pacific, 1988. Chapter 10 "The Pohnpei Island, in finding of sunken city"(pp. 204–229)

Asia's Lands and Peoples, X Chapter: "Natural Basis of Japan" (pp. 196–285), section "South Seas" (pp. 276–277). 1946

Cressey George B.

Annual report to the League of Nations on the administration of the South Sea islands under Japanese Mandate. [Tokyo]: Japanese Government. (Years 1921 to 1938)

Tze M. Loo, , The American Historical Review, Volume 124, Issue 5, December 2019, pp. 1699–1703. doi:10.1093/ahr/rhz1013.

"Islands for an Anxious Empire: Japan's Pacific Island Mandate"

Herbert Rittlinger, Der Masslose Ozean, Stuttgart, Germany, 1939

Sion, Jules. Asie des Moussons, Paris Librarie Armand Colin, (1928) I, 189–266, Chapter X "The Nature of Japan", section XIII "Japanese Colonial Empire" (pp. 294–324), and section IV "Formosa and Southern Islands" (pp. 314–320)

Book Asia, Chapter X "Japanese Empire" (pp. 633–716), section "The Japanese Islands in South Seas".

Media related to South Pacific Mandate at Wikimedia Commons