Katana VentraIP

Inflection

In linguistic morphology, inflection (less commonly, inflexion) is a process of word formation[1] in which a word is modified to express different grammatical categories such as tense, case, voice, aspect, person, number, gender, mood, animacy, and definiteness.[2] The inflection of verbs is called conjugation, and one can refer to the inflection of nouns, adjectives, adverbs, pronouns, determiners, participles, prepositions and postpositions, numerals, articles, etc., as declension.

For other uses, see Inflection (disambiguation).

An inflection expresses grammatical categories with affixation (such as prefix, suffix, infix, circumfix, and transfix), apophony (as Indo-European ablaut), or other modifications.[3] For example, the Latin verb ducam, meaning "I will lead", includes the suffix -am, expressing person (first), number (singular), and tense-mood (future indicative or present subjunctive). The use of this suffix is an inflection. In contrast, in the English clause "I will lead", the word lead is not inflected for any of person, number, or tense; it is simply the bare form of a verb. The inflected form of a word often contains both one or more free morphemes (a unit of meaning which can stand by itself as a word), and one or more bound morphemes (a unit of meaning which cannot stand alone as a word). For example, the English word cars is a noun that is inflected for number, specifically to express the plural; the content morpheme car is unbound because it could stand alone as a word, while the suffix -s is bound because it cannot stand alone as a word. These two morphemes together form the inflected word cars.


Words that are never subject to inflection are said to be invariant; for example, the English verb must is an invariant item: it never takes a suffix or changes form to signify a different grammatical category. Its categories can be determined only from its context. Languages that seldom make use of inflection, such as English, are said to be analytic. Analytic languages that do not make use of derivational morphemes, such as Standard Chinese, are said to be isolating.


Requiring the forms or inflections of more than one word in a sentence to be compatible with each other according to the rules of the language is known as concord or agreement. For example, in "the man jumps", "man" is a singular noun, so "jump" is constrained in the present tense to use the third person singular suffix "s".


Languages that have some degree of inflection are synthetic languages. These can be highly inflected (such as Latin, Greek, Biblical Hebrew, and Sanskrit), or slightly inflected (such as English, Dutch, Persian). Languages that are so inflected that a sentence can consist of a single highly inflected word (such as many Native American languages) are called polysynthetic languages. Languages in which each inflection conveys only a single grammatical category, such as Finnish, are known as agglutinative languages, while languages in which a single inflection can convey multiple grammatical roles (such as both nominative case and plural, as in Latin and German) are called fusional.

Write, wrote, written (marking by variation, and also suffixing in the participle)

ablaut

Sing, sang, sung (ablaut)

Foot, feet (marking by variation)

umlaut

Mouse, mice (umlaut)

Child, children (ablaut, and also suffixing in the plural)

In English most nouns are inflected for number with the inflectional plural affix -s (as in "dog" → "dog-s"), and most English verbs are inflected for tense with the inflectional past tense affix -ed (as in "call" → "call-ed"). English also inflects verbs by affixation to mark the third person singular in the present tense (with -s), and the present participle (with -ing). English short adjectives are inflected to mark comparative and superlative forms (with -er and -est respectively).


There are eight regular inflectional affixes in the English language.[4][5]


Despite the march toward regularization, modern English retains traces of its ancestry, with a minority of its words still using inflection by ablaut (sound change, mostly in verbs) and umlaut (a particular type of sound change, mostly in nouns), as well as long-short vowel alternation. For example:


For details, see English plural, English verbs, and English irregular verbs.

Inflecting a , pronoun, adjective, adverb, article or determiner is known as declining it. The forms may express number, case, gender or degree of comparison.

noun

Inflecting a is called conjugating it. The forms may express tense, mood, voice, aspect, person, or number.

verb

or simply adding morphemes onto the word without changing the root;

Affixation

repeating all or part of a word to change its meaning;

Reduplication

exchanging one sound for another in the root (usually vowel sounds, as in the ablaut process found in Germanic strong verbs and the umlaut often found in nouns, among others);

Alternation

such as of stress, pitch or tone, where no sounds are added or changed but the intonation and relative strength of each sound is altered regularly. For an example, see Initial-stress-derived noun.

Suprasegmental variations

In various languages[edit]

Indo-European languages (fusional)[edit]

Because the Proto-Indo-European language was highly inflected, all of its descendant Indo-European languages, such as Albanian, Armenian, English, German, Ukrainian, Russian, Persian, Kurdish, Italian, Irish, Spanish, French, Hindi, Marathi, Urdu, Bengali, and Nepali, are inflected to a greater or lesser extent. In general, older Indo-European languages such as Latin, Ancient Greek, Old English, Old Norse, Old Church Slavonic and Sanskrit are extensively inflected because of their temporal proximity to Proto-Indo-European. Deflexion has caused modern versions of some Indo-European languages that were previously highly inflected to be much less so; an example is Modern English, as compared to Old English. In general, languages where deflexion occurs replace inflectional complexity with more rigorous word order, which provides the lost inflectional details. Most Slavic languages and some Indo-Aryan languages are an exception to the general Indo-European deflexion trend, continuing to be highly inflected (in some cases acquiring additional inflectional complexity and grammatical genders, as in Czech & Marathi).

Agreement (linguistics)

Diction

Intonation (linguistics)

Introflection

ʾIʿrab

Lexeme

Marker (linguistics)

Morpheme

Nominal TAM

Periphrasis

Righthand head rule

Suppletion

Synthetic language

Tense–aspect–mood

Uninflected word

Linguistic relativity

Agirre, E.; et al. (1992), "XUXEN: A spelling checker/corrector for Basque based on two-level morphology", (PDF), pp. 119–125, archived from the original (PDF) on 30 September 2005

Proceedings of the Third Conference of Applied Natural Language Processing

Bubeník, Vit. (1999). An introduction to the study of morphology. LINCOM coursebooks in linguistics, 07. Munich: LINCOM Europa.  3-89586-570-2.

ISBN

(1988). Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-29653-6. (pbk).

Norman, Jerry

Bauer, Laurie (2003). Introducing linguistic morphology (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.  0-87840-343-4.

ISBN

Haspelmath, Martin (2002). Understanding morphology. London: Arnold, Oxford University Press.  0-340-76025-7. (hb); (pbk).

ISBN

Katamba, Francis (1993). Morphology. Modern linguistics series. New York: St. Martin's Press.  0-312-10101-5. (hb); (pbk).

ISBN

Matthews, Peter (1991). Morphology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  0-521-41043-6. (hb); (pbk).

ISBN

, Johanna (1986). "Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar". Language. 62 (1): 56–119. doi:10.1353/lan.1986.0014. S2CID 144574879.

Nichols

De Reuse, Willem J. (1996). A practical grammar of the San Carlos Apache language. LINCOM Studies in Native American Linguistics 51. LINCOM.  3-89586-861-2.

ISBN

Spencer, Andrew; Zwicky, Arnold M., eds. (1998). The handbook of morphology. Blackwell handbooks in linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.  0-631-18544-5.

ISBN

(2001). Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge studies in linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-78047-0.

Stump, Gregory T.

Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. (2001). An introduction to syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  0-521-63566-7. (pbk); (hb).

ISBN

SIL:

What is inflection?

SIL:

What is an inflectional affix?

SIL:

What is an inflectional category?

SIL:

What is a morphological process?

SIL:

What is derivation?

SIL:

Comparison of inflection and derivation

SIL:

What is an agglutinative language?

SIL:

What is a fusional language?

SIL:

What is an isolating language?

SIL:

What is a polysynthetic language?