Katana VentraIP

Neo-Confucianism

Neo-Confucianism (Chinese: 宋明理學; pinyin: Sòng-Míng lǐxué, often shortened to lǐxué 理學, literally "School of Principle") is a moral, ethical, and metaphysical Chinese philosophy influenced by Confucianism, which originated with Han Yu (768–824) and Li Ao (772–841) in the Tang dynasty, and became prominent during the Song and Ming dynasties under the formulations of Zhu Xi (1130–1200). After the Mongol conquest of China in the thirteenth century, Chinese scholars and officials restored and preserved neo-Confucianism as a way to safeguard the cultural heritage of China.[1]

This article is about a movement developed during the Song and Ming dynasties. For a movement that emerged in the 20th century, see New Confucianism.

Neo-Confucianism

宋明理學

宋明理学

"Song-Ming [dynasty] rational idealism"

Sòng-Míng lǐxué

Sòng-Míng lǐxué

ㄙㄨㄥˋ ㄇㄧㄥˊ ㄌㄧˇ ㄒㄩㄝˊ

Sonq-Ming liishyue

Sung4-Ming2 li3-hsüeh2

Sung-Mìhng léih-hohk

Sung3 Ming4 lei5 hok6

Sòng-Bîng lí-ha̍k

Lý học

理學

성리학

性理學

宋明理学

そうみんりがく

Sō Min rigaku

Sō Min rigaku

Sô Min rigaku

Neo-Confucianism could have been an attempt to create a more rationalist and secular form of Confucianism by rejecting superstitious and mystical elements of Taoism and Buddhism that had influenced Confucianism during and after the Han dynasty.[2] Although the neo-Confucianists were critical of Taoism and Buddhism, the two did have an influence on the philosophy, and the neo-Confucianists borrowed terms and concepts. However, unlike the Buddhists and Taoists, who saw metaphysics as a catalyst for spiritual development, religious enlightenment, and immortality, the neo-Confucianists used metaphysics as a guide for developing a rationalist ethical philosophy.[3][4] Traditional Confucian beliefs such as gender roles were also included, leading to the devaluing of women in Korea.

Bureaucratic examinations[edit]

Neo-Confucianism became the interpretation of Confucianism whose mastery was necessary to pass the bureaucratic examinations by the Ming, and continued in this way through the Qing dynasty until the end of the Imperial examination system in 1905. However, many scholars such as Benjamin Elman have questioned the degree to which their role as the orthodox interpretation in state examinations reflects the degree to which both the bureaucrats and Chinese gentry actually believed those interpretations, and point out that there were very active schools such as Han learning which offered competing interpretations of Confucianism.


The competing school of Confucianism was called the Evidential School or Han Learning and argued that neo-Confucianism had caused the teachings of Confucianism to be hopelessly contaminated with Buddhist thinking. This school also criticized neo-Confucianism for being overly concerned with empty philosophical speculation that was unconnected with reality.

Confucian canon[edit]

The Confucian canon as it exists today was essentially compiled by Zhu Xi. Zhu codified the canon of Four Books (the Great Learning, the Doctrine of the Mean, the Analects of Confucius, and the Mencius) which in the subsequent Ming and Qing dynasties were made the core of the official curriculum for the civil service examination.

New Confucianism[edit]

In the 1920s, New Confucianism, also known as modern neo-Confucianism, started developing and absorbed the Western learning to seek a way to modernize Chinese culture based on the traditional Confucianism. It centers on four topics: The modern transformation of Chinese culture; Humanistic spirit of Chinese culture; Religious connotation in Chinese culture; and Intuitive way of thinking, to go beyond the logic and to wipe out the concept of exclusion analysis. Adhering to the traditional Confucianism and the neo-confucianism, the modern neo-Confucianism contributes the nation's emerging from the predicament faced by the ancient Chinese traditional culture in the process of modernization; furthermore, it also promotes the world culture of industrial civilization rather than the traditional personal senses.

Chan, Wing-tsit (1963), A Sourcebook of Chinese Philosophy, Princeton: Princeton University Press,  978-0-691-07137-4

ISBN

Chan, Wing-tsit, trans. Instructions for Practical Living and Other Neo-Confucian Writings by Wang Yang-ming. New York: , 1963.

Columbia University Press

Chan, Wing-tsit (1946). . Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

China

Craig, Edward (1998). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Volume 7. Taylor & Francis.  978-0-415-07310-3.

ISBN

Daehwan, Noh. . Korea Journal (Winter 2003).

"The Eclectic Development of Neo-Confucianism and Statecraft from the 18th to the 19th Century"

de Bary, William Theodore; Chaffee, John W., eds. (1989). . University of California Press. pp. 455–. ISBN 978-0-520-06393-8.

Neo-confucian Education: The Formative Stage

de Bary, William Theodore; et al., eds. (2008). Sources of East Asian Tradition. New York: Columbia University Press. (Vol. 1  978-0-231-14305-9) (Vol. 2 ISBN 978-0-231-14323-3)

ISBN

de Bary, William Theodore (1989). The Message of the Mind in Neo-Confucianism. New York: Columbia University Press.  0231068085.

ISBN

Ebrey, Patricia Buckley. Chinese Civilization: A Sourcebook. New York: Free, 1993. Print.

Henderson, John B. (1998). . Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. ISBN 9780791437599.

The Construction of Orthodoxy and Heresy: Neo-Confucian, Islamic, Jewish, and Early Christian Patterns

Huang, Siu-chi (1999). Essentials of Neo-Confucianism: Eight Major Philosophers of the Song and Ming Periods. Westport: .

Greenwood Press

Levinson, David; Christensen, Karen, eds. (2002). Encyclopedia of Modern Asia. Vol. 4. . pp. 302–307.

Charles Scribner's Sons

, ed. (2001). The Columbia History of Chinese Literature. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-10984-9. (Amazon Kindle edition).

Mair, Victor H.

Tu Weiming. Neo-Confucian Thought in Action: Wang Yang-ming’s Youth (1472–1509). Berkeley and Los Angeles: , 1976.

University of California Press

Tu Weiming. Confucian Thought: Selfhood as Creative Transformation. New York: , 1985.

State University of New York Press

. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

"Neo-Confucian Philosophy"

from the Song dynasty (in English and Chinese)

Writings of the Orthodox School